Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 25;15(13):1613.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131613.

Learning Curve of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Pleural Lesions: A Retrospective Study at Two Tertiary Referral Hospitals

Affiliations

Learning Curve of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy for Pleural Lesions: A Retrospective Study at Two Tertiary Referral Hospitals

Byunggeon Park et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous pleural needle biopsy (PCPNB) is increasingly performed as a minimally invasive approach for the diagnosis of pleural lesions. However, no prior studies have investigated the learning curve for this method. The purpose of this study was to assess the learning curve of US-guided PCPNB using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method and to calculate the number of procedures to achieve proficiency. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 491 US-guided PCPNBs performed by four board-certified radiologists at two tertiary referral hospitals from January 2012 to December 2024. The standard and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) techniques were used to evaluate diagnostic success and false-negative rates. The potential impact of previous percutaneous needle biopsy (PCNB) experience on the learning curve was also assessed. Results: The overall diagnostic success and false-negative rate were 89.2% (438/491) and 8.1% (40/491), respectively. Operators achieved acceptable diagnostic success in US-guided PCPNB after a median of 15 (range, 12-45) procedures in standard CUSUM analysis and 22 (range, 10-33) procedures in RA-CUSUM analysis. Acceptable false-negative rates were attained after 18 (range, 14-42) and 24 (range, 12-44) procedures, respectively. Operators with prior PCNB experience required 12 procedures to achieve both acceptable diagnostic success and an acceptable false-negative rate. In contrast, those without experience required 29 and 27 procedures, respectively. Complications occurred in 1.4% (7/491), including one major complication (0.2%). Conclusions: Diagnostic proficiency and procedural safety in performing US-guided PCPNB improved with increasing operator experience. The low complication rate highlights the clinical safety and feasibility of US-guided PCPNB.

Keywords: learning curve; pleura; ultrasound-guided biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study. PCPNB = percutaneous pleural needle biopsy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CUSUM graphs of diagnostic success and false negative rate. Standard (A) and risk-adjusted (B) CUSUM graphs of diagnostic success. Standard (C) and risk-adjusted (D) CUSUM graphs of false negative rate. Diagnostic success results in a downward trend, whereas diagnostic failures lead to an upward trend. CUSUM = cumulative summation, H0 = lower decision limit, H1 = upper decision limit.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CUSUM graphs stratified by operator subgroups based on prior experience in percutaneous needle biopsy during radiology residency. Standard (A) and risk-adjusted (B) CUSUM graphs of diagnostic success. Standard (C) and risk-adjusted (D) CUSUM graphs of false negative rate.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of increasingly stringent failure criteria on CUSUM graphs. Standard (A) and risk-adjusted (B) CUSUM graphs of diagnostic success. Standard (C) and risk-adjusted (D) CUSUM graphs of false negative rate.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bødtger U., Halifax R.J. Pleural Disease. European Respiratory Society; Lausanne, Switzerland: 2020. Epidemiology: Why is pleural disease becoming more common? pp. 1–12.
    1. Leung A.N., Müller N., Miller R.R. CT in differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1990;154:487–492. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.3.2106209. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jany B., Welte T. Pleural effusion in adults—Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2019;116:377. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0377. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee P., Hsu A., Lo C., Colt H.G. Prospective evaluation of flex-rigid pleuroscopy for indeterminate pleural effusion: Accuracy, safety and outcome. Respirology. 2007;12:881–886. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01144.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boy D., Shaw J.A., Koegelenberg C.F.N. Ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy. Eurasian J. Pulmonol. 2023;25:1. doi: 10.14744/ejp.2021.9621. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources