Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 3;14(13):4721.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14134721.

VIVA Stent Preclinical Evaluation in Swine: A Novel Cerebral Venous Stent with a Unique Delivery System

Affiliations

VIVA Stent Preclinical Evaluation in Swine: A Novel Cerebral Venous Stent with a Unique Delivery System

Yuval Ramot et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Venous sinus stenting is a promising treatment for intracranial venous disorders, such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension and pulsatile tinnitus, associated with transverse sinus stenosis. The VIVA Stent System (VSS) is a novel self-expanding braided venous stent designed to navigate tortuous cerebral venous anatomy. This preclinical study assessed the safety, thrombogenicity, and performance of the VSS in a swine model. Methods: Fifteen swine underwent bilateral internal mammary vein stenting with either the VSS (n = 9) or the PRECISE® PRO RX stent (n = 6, reference). Fluoroscopy and thrombogenicity assessments were conducted on the day of stenting, clinical pathology analysis was carried out throughout the in-life phase, and CT Venography was performed before sacrifice. Animals were sacrificed at 30 ± 3 or 180 ± 11 days post-stenting for necropsy and histological evaluation. Results: Fluoroscopic angiography confirmed the successful VSS deployment with complete venous wall apposition and no vessel damage. The VSS achieved the highest scores on a four-point Likert scale for most performance parameters. No thrombus formation was observed on either delivery system. CT Venography confirmed vessel patency, no stent migration, and complete stent integrity. Histopathology showed a mild, expected foreign body reaction at 30 days, which resolved by 180 days, indicating normal healing progression. Both stents showed increased luminal diameter and decreased wall thickness at 180 days, suggesting vessel recovery. No adverse reactions were observed in non-target organs. Conclusions: The VSS exhibited favorable safety, procedural performance, and thromboresistance in a swine model, supporting its potential clinical use for treating transverse sinus stenosis and related conditions.

Keywords: VIVA Stent System; preclinical study; thrombogenicity; transverse sinus stenosis; venous sinus stenting; venous stenting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Anat Horev is an employee of VFlow Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A,B). Representative histological images of the proximal segment (~0.5 cm from the stent’s edge) of the VIVA Stent (test device) in Animal 14256, retrieved from the left internal mammary vein at 1 month post-implantation. (A) Low-magnification view demonstrating the overall stent structure and tissue response. (B) High-magnification view highlighting key histopathological features. Thin arrows indicate stent struts, while thick arrows mark the neointimal layer forming around the stent. The arrowhead denotes a foreign body reaction surrounding the struts. Red/purple luminal protrusions reflect post-mortem clot formation, which is a normal histological artifact. (C,D) Representative histological images of the proximal segment (~0.5 cm from the stent’s edge) of the PRECISE® PRO RX Stent (reference device) in Animal 14255, retrieved from the left internal mammary vein at 1 month post-implantation. (C) Low-magnification view illustrating the overall stent structure and surrounding tissue response. (D) High-magnification view providing detailed visualization of the neointimal reaction. Thin arrows indicate stent struts, while thick arrows highlight the neointimal layer. The arrowhead denotes a foreign body reaction surrounding the struts. Red luminal protrusions correspond to post-mortem clot formation, a common histological artifact. (E,F) Representative histological images of the proximal segment (~0.5 cm from the stent’s edge) of the VIVA Stent (test device) in Animal 14114, retrieved from the right internal mammary vein at 6 months post-implantation. (E) Low-magnification view showing the overall stent structure and tissue integration. (F) High-magnification view detailing the neointimal response and luminal characteristics. Thin arrows indicate stent struts, while thick arrows highlight the neointimal layer. Red luminal protrusions represent post-mortem clot formation, a normal histological artifact. (G,H) Representative histological images of the proximal segment (~0.5 cm from the stent’s edge) of the PRECISE® PRO RX Stent (reference device) in Animal 14121, retrieved from the left internal mammary vein at 6 months post-implantation. (G) Low-magnification view displaying the overall stent structure and surrounding tissue response. (H) High-magnification view providing detailed visualization of the neointimal reaction. Thin arrows indicate stent struts, while thick arrows highlight the neointimal layer. Red luminal protrusions correspond to post-mortem clot formation, a normal histological artifact.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ahmed R.M., Wilkinson M., Parker G.D., Thurtell M., Macdonald J., McCluskey P., Allan R., Dunne V., Hanlon M., Owler B., et al. Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1408–1414. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2575. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puffer R.C., Mustafa W., Lanzino G. Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A review of the literature. J. Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5:483–486. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010468. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fargen K.M. A unifying theory explaining venous sinus stenosis and recurrent stenosis following venous sinus stenting in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J. Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13:587–592. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Starke R.M., Wang T., Ding D., Durst C.R., Crowley R.W., Chalouhi N., Hasan D.M., Dumont A.S., Jabbour P., Liu K.C., et al. Endovascular Treatment of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Complications, Neurological Outcomes, and Radiographic Results. Sci. World J. 2015;2015:140408. doi: 10.1155/2015/140408. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dinkin M.J., Patsalides A. Idiopathic Intracranial Venous Hypertension: Toward a Better Understanding of Venous Stenosis and the Role of Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. J. Neuroophthalmol. 2023;43:451–463. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001898. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources