Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1979 Nov;67(3):329-35.
doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb08684.x.

The effects of histamine on responses of the rabbit ear artery to electrical stimulation and to exogenous noradrenaline

The effects of histamine on responses of the rabbit ear artery to electrical stimulation and to exogenous noradrenaline

A Foldes et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1979 Nov.

Abstract

1 The effects of a subconstrictor dose of histamine (9 x 10(-7) mol/l) on the responses of the isolated perfused ear artery of the rabbit to electrical stimulation (E.S.) and to exogenous noradrenaline (NA) were investigated.2 Both intraluminal (I/L) and extraluminal (E/L) histamine potentiated responses to E.S. and to I/L NA to the same extent.3 Mepyramine alone (2.5 x 10(-6) mol/l) had no effect on the response of the ear artery to either stimulus, but in the presence of this concentration of mepyramine, the potentiation by histamine of the response to I/L NA was significantly decreased and that to E.S. was replaced by inhibition.4 The H(1)-receptor agonist, 2(2-pyridyl) ethylamine, applied I/L potentiated responses to I/L NA at both concentrations used (5.1 and 51 x 10(-7) mol/l), but only potentiated the effects of E.S. at the higher concentration.5 The H(2)-receptor antagonist, metiamide (4 x 10(-6) mol/l), alone did not alter the extent of potentiation of responses to either E.S. or I/L NA by histamine. This suggests relatively weak H(2)-receptor activity in the rabbit ear artery. In the presence, but not the absence of metiamide, the potentiation by histamine of the I/L NA response was reversible, an observation suggesting an interaction between metiamide and the non-reversible component of the potentiating effect of histamine.6 These results are interpreted in terms of postsynaptic H(1)-receptors which potentiate and presynaptic H(2)-receptors which inhibit contractile responses in the ear artery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circ Res. 1975 May;36(5):647-53 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1976 Oct;39(4):566-73 - PubMed
    1. J Med Chem. 1975 Sep;18(9):905-9 - PubMed
    1. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1965 Oct;43(5):639-56 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1970 Jul;174(1):123-32 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources