Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 12.
doi: 10.1111/jir.70009. Online ahead of print.

Studying the Experiences of Children With Moderate to Profound Intellectual Disabilities in Research: A Systematic Review

Satu Peltomäki  1   2 , Sirpa Granö  2 , Ella Rönkkö  1 , Raija Pirttimaa  3 , Kirsi Pyhältö  1 , Elina Kontu  2
Affiliations
Review

Studying the Experiences of Children With Moderate to Profound Intellectual Disabilities in Research: A Systematic Review

Satu Peltomäki et al. J Intellect Disabil Res. .

Abstract

Background: Children with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities are not usually invited to share their lived experiences through research. In addition to their difficulties in communication and cognitive functions, their exclusion is caused by the lack of suitable data collection instruments. Since the 1990s, more research has focused on the lived experiences of people with intellectual disabilities. The aim of this review is to examine how the experiences of children with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities have been studied.

Method: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies were searched from CINAHL, Education Collection, Sociology Collection, Social Science Database and PsycINFO in November 2023 and January 2025. Eligible studies had been published since the year 2000 in English or Finnish, included at least one child with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities and aimed to collect their experiences. General study details, population characteristics, and data collection details were extracted. The methodological quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The analysis included a descriptive summary and inductive content analysis with intercoder reliability assessment.

Results: The eligible studies (n = 41) used individual interviews, questionnaires, task-based approaches, observations and focus groups. Participants were mainly 12 years or older, had moderate intellectual disabilities, and could communicate with speech. The adaptations (i.e., any adjustments made for specific needs) comprised four top-level categories and 27 subcategories. The most commonly used adaptations and adaptations for different participant groups are presented.

Conclusions: Individual interviews and questionnaires with simple adaptations usually suit children with moderate intellectual disabilities who use speech to communicate. Individual interviews with multiple adaptations can be suitable for a wider group. Some task-based approaches and profound and long-lasting observations can be considered with children with non-symbolic communication and severe or profound intellectual disabilities.

Keywords: adaptation; adolescent; data collection; intellectual disability; participation; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bailey, S., K. Boddy, S. Briscoe, and C. Morris. 2014. “Involving Disabled Children and Young People as Partners in Research: A Systematic Review.” Child: Care, Health and Development 41: 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12197.
    1. Broström, S. 2012. “Children's Participation in Research.” International Journal of Early Years Education 20, no. 3: 1–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2012.715407.
    1. Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. Routledge.
    1. Cooke, A., D. Smith, and A. Booth. 2012. “Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.” Qualitative Health Research 22: 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938.
    1. Corby, D., L. Taggart, and W. Cousins. 2015. “People With Intellectual Disability and Human Science Research: A Systematic Review of Phenomenological Studies Using Interviews for Data Collection.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 47: 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.001.