Effects of different B-cell-depleting strategies on the lymphatic tissue
- PMID: 40651933
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.2120
Effects of different B-cell-depleting strategies on the lymphatic tissue
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the efficacy of new protein-based B cell depletion with glyco-engineered anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab (OBI) and the CD19/CD3 T cell engager blinatumomab (BLI) in patients with autoimmune diseases (AIDs) in comparison to rituximab (RTX) and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy.
Methods: Sequential inguinal lymph node biopsies were taken before and after treatment with OBI-, BLI-, RTX- and CD19-CAR T cells in patients with AID. CD19+ and CD20+ B cells, plasma cells, T cells and macrophages were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Changes in follicular architecture (follicular dendritic cells, T follicular helper cells, proliferation) were also assessed.
Results: Baseline and follow-up lymph node biopsies from 24 patients with AID (OBI, 4; BLI, 4; RTX, 4; CD19-CAR T cells, 12) were analysed. B cell depletion was confirmed in all CD19-CAR T cell-treated patients but only in 1 (OBI) out of 12 protein-based B cell-treated patients. Likewise, follicular architecture was disrupted in all CD19-CAR T cell-treated patients but only in 1 (OBI) out of 12 protein-based B cell-treated patients. B cell depletion efficacy in the lymph nodes was 100% for CD19-CAR T cells, 92% for OBI, 86% for RTX and 69% for BLI. Plasma cells were reduced but not depleted in all treatment approaches. CD3+ T cells and CD68+ macrophages remained unaffected. Peripheral blood B cell depletion occurred in all but 1 BLI-treated patient. B cell depletion was associated with stable drug-free remission, whereas a reduction in B cell numbers without depletion required retreatment with immunomodulatory drugs.
Conclusions: Protein-based B cell depletion reduces but usually does not deplete B cells in lymph nodes leaving the follicular architecture intact and being associated with disease recurrence.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests CT has received consulting fees from Sanofi. GS has received speaker honoraria from BMS, Cabaletta, Janssen, Kyverna, Miltenyi and Novartis. AM has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, BioNTech, Miltenyi Biomedicine and Century Therapeutics. MADA has received grants or contracts from Amgen, AbbVie, UCB, Pfizer, J&J and Galapagos and speaker honoraria and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, BMS, UCB, J&J, Biogen, MSD, Lilly and Galapagos. FM has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Sobi, BMS, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Janssen and BioNTech.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
