Structural rearrangements affect blastocyst development
- PMID: 40652118
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-08101-8
Structural rearrangements affect blastocyst development
Abstract
Purpose: It is disputable whether chromosomal translocations lead to an inferior embryo development. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether structural rearrangements (SR) affect blastocyst formation as compared to monogenic disorders in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles.
Methods: A total of 791 PGT-SR cycles and 757 PGT-M cycles from January 2021 to May 2023 were included.
Results: Lower blastocyst formation (graded 3BB or higher) rate was detected in the PGT-SR group compared with the control PGT-M group. In addition, lower proportion of day 5 blastocysts was found in the PGT-SR group compared with the control PGT-M group. Overall, a comparatively 12.7% lower proportion of eligible blastocysts in PGT-SR cycles. As expected, there were fewer balanced/normal blastocysts for transfer in the PGT-SR group (balanced/normal blastocysts rate, 32.3 vs. 59.9%, P = 0.02). The estimated curve by inverse model showed that yields of transferrable balanced/normal blastocyst per cycle came to a plateau stage followed with a rapid rise once the oocytes retrieved reached to the number of 20.4 in PGT-M cycle and 28.3 in PGT-SR cycle respectively.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that patients with SR had a high chance of obtaining lower blastocyst development and significantly fewer usable blastocysts available for transfer compared to PGT-M in their first ovarian stimulation cycle.
Keywords: Blastocyst development; Blastocyst formation; Preimplantation genetic testing; Structural rearrangements.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. Ethical approval: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study by the institutional review board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-Sen University [Application ID: (2018)029; Date of Approval: January 2018]. This research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective analysis of anonymized data. Consent to participate: Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective analysis of anonymized data. Consent to publish: Not applicable.
Similar articles
-
Total gonadotropin dose did not affect euploid blastocyst rates: an analysis of more than 19,000 oocytes.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Sep;41(9):2385-2396. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03183-w. Epub 2024 Jul 13. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39001951
-
Day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 24;11(11):CD013233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013233.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36423200 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of day 5 versus day 6 blastocyst biopsy in preimplantation genetic testing: clinical and neonatal outcomes.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 16;16:1544009. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1544009. eCollection 2025. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40589507 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements by genome-wide SNP genotyping and haplotype analysis: a prospective multicenter clinical study.EBioMedicine. 2025 Jan;111:105514. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105514. Epub 2024 Dec 20. EBioMedicine. 2025. PMID: 39708428 Free PMC article.
-
Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 29;2013(7):CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 21;8:CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub5. PMID: 23897513 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Nakano T, Ammae M, Satoh M, Mizuno S, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y (2022) Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement. Reprod Med Biol 21(1):e12476 - PubMed - PMC
-
- Franssen MT, Musters AM, van der Veen F, Repping S, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Goddijn M, Korevaar JC (2011) Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17(4):467–475 - PubMed
-
- Di-Battista A, Favilla BP, Zamariolli M, Nunes N, Defelicibus A, Armelin-Correa L, da Silva IT, Reymond A, Moyses-Oliveira M, Melaragno MI (2023) Premature ovarian insufficiency is associated with global alterations in the regulatory landscape and gene expression in balanced X-autosome translocations. Epigenetics Chromatin 16(1):19 - PubMed - PMC
-
- Olszewska M, Wiland E, Huleyuk N, Fraczek M, Midro AT, Zastavna D, Kurpisz M (2019) Chromosome (re)positioning in spermatozoa of fathers and sons - carriers of reciprocal chromosome translocation (RCT). BMC Med Genom 12(1):30
Grants and funding
- 202201011548/Guangzhou Science and Technology Project
- 2019A1515010991/Natural Science Found of Guangdong China
- A2025203/Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China
- 2018YFC1003102/National Key Research and Development Program of China
- 2023P-ZD19/Key Clinical Technique of Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials