Subtypes of suicidal ideation among university students - An ecological momentary assessment study
- PMID: 40652971
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119865
Subtypes of suicidal ideation among university students - An ecological momentary assessment study
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Subtypes of suicidal ideation among university students - An ecological momentary assessment study" [J. Affect. Disord. 391 (2025) 119865].J Affect Disord. 2026 Jan 16:121173. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121173. Online ahead of print. J Affect Disord. 2026. PMID: 41547624 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death among youth ages 15 to 29. This study identifies suicidal ideation (SI) subtypes among university students based on daily reports of SI, assesses how stress sensitivity may affect SI variability within these subtypes, and how they differ in terms of past and future self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB).
Methods: 756 students participated in a 14-day ecological momentary assessment and web-based survey at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Latent Profile Analysis identified SI subtypes using indicators of intensity, variability and frequency. Multinomial regressions evaluated the associations between SITB and SI subtypes, as well between SI subtypes and future SITB. Linear models assessed how stress sensitivity was associated to SI variability within the subtypes.
Results: Three SI subtypes were identified: sporadic and low intensity/variability (S1), frequent and medium intensity/variability (S2), and frequent and high intensity/variability (S3). Stress sensitivity was highest in S2 and S3, in S3 higher stress sensitivity was associated with lower day-to-day variability. Nearly all aORs for SITB significantly increased from S1 to S3 compared to controls, with each subtype showing higher aORs compared to the previous subtype (S3 vs, S2 vs S1). S3 students showed higher persistence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors at follow-up (aOR = 20.6; 95 % CI = 8.3-51.2), with 4 of the 7 attempts occurring among students in this subtype.
Conclusions: Daily SI severity predicts future active SI and attempts, with stress sensitivity contributing to more extreme, rigid suicidal thinking. Targeting stress sensitivity could be effective for suicide prevention among university students.
Keywords: Affect reactivity; College students; Experience sampling methods; Mental health; Stress sensitivity; Suicidal ideation.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Miquel Roca received research funds or grants from Adamed, Esteve, Janssen, Lundbeck and Viatris not related with the content of this manuscript.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
