Body roundness index (BRI) and obesity-related anthropometrics: Relationship to visceral adiposity, insulin sensitivity index and cardiometabolic risk
- PMID: 40654034
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.16601
Body roundness index (BRI) and obesity-related anthropometrics: Relationship to visceral adiposity, insulin sensitivity index and cardiometabolic risk
Abstract
Aims: Visceral adiposity is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Traditional anthropometric measures like body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) have limited accuracy, while a newer measure, body roundness index (BRI), is touted as being a better predictor of visceral adiposity but requires further validation. The aim of this study is to compare BRI with other traditional metrics of adiposity: WC, BMI and percentage (%) body fat, visceral adiposity and insulin sensitivity among the multiethnic cohorts in Asia.
Materials and methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 264 young, healthy and normoglycemic adult males (101 Chinese, 85 Malay, 82 South Asian) with ages of 28.4 ± 6.0, 27.6 ± 5.1 and 26.0 ± 4.8 years. Anthropometric measures (BMI, WC, WHR, BRI), bioimpedance analysis (for percentage body fat), MRI-measured visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT, SAT), and hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp for insulin sensitivity index (ISI) were assessed.
Results: BRI correlated significantly with VAT (r = 0.72), SAT (r = 0.85), and ISI (r = -0.51), but performed similarly to BMI, WC and percentage body fat. BRI showed consistent results across ethnic groups, with the highest VAT correlation in Malays (r = 0.76). Percentage body fat measured by bioimpedance was as effective as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in predicting adiposity, while WHR had the weakest correlation with VAT.
Conclusions: BRI, while strongly correlated with visceral adiposity and ISI, does not outperform simpler measures like WC or percentage body fat. Bioimpedance, being non-invasive, demonstrates utility in assessing visceral adiposity in clinical settings. Ethnic-specific thresholds for BRI and WC may improve precision in obesity-related health assessments.
Keywords: bioimpedance; body roundness index; obesity; visceral adiposity.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Britton KA, Massaro JM, Murabito JM, Kreger BE, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. Body fat distribution, incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all‐cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(10):921‐925. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.027
-
- Zheng D, Zhao C, Ma K, et al. Association between visceral adiposity index and risk of diabetes and prediabetes: results from the NHANES (1999–2018). PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0299285. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299285
-
- Mina T, Xie W, Low DY, et al. Adiposity and metabolic health in Asian populations: an epidemiological study using dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry in Singapore. Lancet Diabet Endocrinol. 2024;12(10):704‐715. doi:10.1016/S2213‐8587(24)00195‐5
-
- Liu J, Jin X, Feng Z, Huang J. Using anthropometric parameters to predict insulin resistance among patients without diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):21407. doi:10.1038/s41598‐024‐57020‐2
-
- Murai N, Saito N, Oka R, et al. Body roundness index is better correlated with insulin sensitivity than body shape index in young and middle‐aged Japanese persons. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2024;22(2):151‐159. doi:10.1089/met.2023.0175
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
