Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer following complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in Canada
- PMID: 40654114
- DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2530862
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer following complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in Canada
Abstract
Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant pembrolizumab (Keytruda) versus routine observation of adult patients with stage IB (T2a ≥ 4 cm) -IIIA with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) <50% who have undergone complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy from the Canadian public healthcare payer perspective.
Materials and methods: A Markov model was constructed to capture clinical and economic outcomes across four health states: disease-free (DF), local-regional recurrence (LR), distant metastases (DM), and death. Transition probabilities (TPs) from the DF state were populated using clinical trial data from KEYNOTE-091. TPs from the LR state were from real-world evidence (RWE). Clinical trial and network meta-analysis output populated transitions from DM. TPs from LR and DM were calibrated to fit the KEYNOTE-091 survival data. Costs were reported in 2023 Canadian dollars and utilities were based on data from KEYNOTE-091 and metastatic NSCLC clinical trials.
Results: Pembrolizumab extended life years (LYs) (1.55) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (1.19). Costs increased by $84,050, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per additional LY of $54,219 and per additional QALY of $70,725, below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. Survival gains associated with pembrolizumab were attributed to more time spent in the DF health state. Higher costs for pembrolizumab were due to adjuvant treatment costs but were partially offset by lower subsequent treatment costs in downstream health states, reflecting a lower risk of recurrence associated with pembrolizumab. The model results remained robust across scenario and sensitivity analyses.
Limitations: Due to lack of transition probabilities starting from the LR and DM states from the KEYNOTE-091 trial, TPs from the LR and DM states were estimated using non-trial sources.
Conclusions: Adjuvant pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective compared to routine observation from the public healthcare payer perspective in Canada.
Keywords: Canada; Cost-effectiveness; D61; I15; I18; Markov model; early-stage lung cancer; pembrolizumab.
Plain language summary
Pembrolizumab was recently recommended for reimbursement in Canada as the first active treatment for adult patients with completely resected stage IB (T2 > 4 cm)-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) <50% who have undergone adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. This study estimated the lifetime costs and clinical benefits of pembrolizumab versus routine observation in the Canadian public healthcare setting. The model captured the patient journey from treatment initiation to possible recurrence to death, including costs and quality-of-life. The model included costs for treatment, administration, disease management, testing, adverse events, subsequent treatments and end of life. Pembrolizumab was associated with longer survival and quality-adjusted survival versus routine observation and was a cost-effective treatment across a range of scenarios.
Similar articles
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as an Adjuvant Treatment in Colombia for Melanoma Patients with Lymph Node Involvement After Complete Resection.Adv Ther. 2023 Jun;40(6):2836-2854. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02484-3. Epub 2023 May 2. Adv Ther. 2023. PMID: 37129772 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of enzalutamide with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone for the treatment of high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in Canada.J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):766-777. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2503660. Epub 2025 May 23. J Med Econ. 2025. PMID: 40395149
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for High Programmed Death Ligand 1 Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Depends on Long-Term Survivors.Clin Drug Investig. 2025 Aug;45(8):583-598. doi: 10.1007/s40261-025-01456-5. Epub 2025 Jul 9. Clin Drug Investig. 2025. PMID: 40632461 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17999840
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous