Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):e040769.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040769. Epub 2025 Jul 14.

Development and Validation of an Incident Hypertension Risk Prediction Model for Young Adults

Affiliations

Development and Validation of an Incident Hypertension Risk Prediction Model for Young Adults

Jaejin An et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Identifying young adults at high risk of hypertension can improve blood pressure screening recommendations.

Methods: We developed models to predict incident hypertension using diverse contemporary cohorts of young adults aged 18 to 39 years from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (derivation and internal validation) and 3 cohort studies (CARDIA [Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults], FHS [Framingham Heart Study], HCHS/SOL [Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos]; external validation). Predictors included age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, smoking, social determinants of health, comorbidities, high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders. We used Cox elastic net and random survival forests to develop sex-specific models and compared their performance to 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force blood pressure screening recommendations.

Results: Among 355 524 adults from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (mean age, 29 years; mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure, 115/70 mm Hg), 11.7% developed hypertension in a median of 5.4 years. External validation showed good discrimination and calibration (Harrell's C-statistic, 0.76 and 0.82; Integrated Brier Score, 0.04 and 0.02 for men and women, respectively). Compared with US Preventive Services Task Force, a 10-year risk for hypertension of ≥15% in the external cohort using the new model showed similar sensitivity (men, 0.90 versus 0.89; women, 0.81 versus 0.81) and moderate improvement in specificity (men, 0.35 versus 0.25; women, 0.66 versus 0.44). Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the prediction model estimated 28.5 million US young adults being at high risk of hypertension compared with 45.3 million by the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Conclusions: Compared with the US Preventive Services Task Force, the hypertension risk prediction model may be a more efficient tool to identify high-risk young adults for early intervention.

Keywords: hypertension; prediction model; young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr An and Ms Choi receive research support from Bayer AG unrelated to this work. Dr Reynolds receives research support from Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC unrelated to this work. Dr Colantonio receives research support from Amgen unrelated to this work. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of study sample.
CARDIA indicates Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults; FHS, Framingham Heart Study; HCHS/SOL, Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos; and KPSC, Kaiser Permanente Southern California.
Figure 2
Figure 2. High risk, sensitivity, specificity using the prediction model vs USPSTF by subgroups, KPSC cohort.
A, Normal‐weight men, (B) normal‐weight women, (C) overweight men, (D) overweight women, (E) men with obesity, (F) women with obesity, (G) Asian and Pacific Islander men, (H) Asian and Pacific Islander women, (I) Black men, (J) Black women, (K) Hispanic men, (L) Hispanic women, (M) White men, and (N) White women. KPSC indicates Kaiser Permanente Southern California; PI, Pacific Islander; and USPSTF, US Preventive Services Task Force.

Comment in

References

    1. Wilmot KA, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S, Ford ES, Vaccarino V. Coronary heart disease mortality declines in the United States from 1979 through 2011: evidence for stagnation in young adults, especially women. Circulation. 2015;132:997–1002. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.015293 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta A, Wang Y, Spertus JA, Geda M, Lorenze N, Nkonde‐Price C, D'Onofrio G, Lichtman JH, Krumholz HM. Trends in acute myocardial infarction in young patients and differences by sex and race, 2001 to 2010. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.054 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arora S, Stouffer GA, Kucharska‐Newton AM, Qamar A, Vaduganathan M, Pandey A, Porterfield D, Blankstein R, Rosamond WD, Bhatt DL, et al. Twenty year trends and sex differences in young adults hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2019;139:1047–1056. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.037137 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekker MS, Verhoeven JI, Vaartjes I, van Nieuwenhuizen KM, Klijn CJM, de Leeuw FE. Stroke incidence in young adults according to age, subtype, sex, and time trends. Neurology. 2019;92:e2444–e2454. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007533 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vikulova DN, Grubisic M, Zhao Y, Lynch K, Humphries KH, Pimstone SN, Brunham LR. Premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: trends in incidence, risk factors, and sex‐related differences, 2000 to 2016. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e012178. doi: 10.1161/jaha.119.012178 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources