Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 27:12:1568164.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1568164. eCollection 2025.

A scoping review on pair housing dairy calves: health and performance outcomes and tactics to reduce cross-sucking behavior

Affiliations
Review

A scoping review on pair housing dairy calves: health and performance outcomes and tactics to reduce cross-sucking behavior

Gillian D Plaugher et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Calves raised in pairs or triplets often experience better growth performance outcomes when compared to their individually housed peers. However, veterinarians may be concerned that pair housing compromises calf health, and producers are concerned about abnormal oral behavior (e.g., cross-sucking). In this literature review, we evaluated the effect of pair or triplet housing vs. individual housing practices on calf health outcomes and performance since 2016. We also evaluated the literature on mitigation strategies to ameliorate cross-sucking in socially housed calves. We found that when researchers used pair housing practices, there was a lack of association between housing practice and risk of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) status in all studies (100%, 7/7). Only one study lacking healthy control calves found a negative effect on calf diarrhea in week 3 (1/8 studies). However, a moderate number of researchers (57%, 4/7) did not use a validated clinical scoring system to diagnose calves with BRD status. Half of the researchers (50%, 4/8) also did not report their diagnostic criteria for diagnosing diarrhea in their calves, and we suggest this is needed for future work. All researchers who fed calves at least 7 L/d of milk and recorded calf starter intakes found that pair-housed calves consumed more calf starter either preweaning or post-weaning (100% 6/6). However, growth benefits were only observed in 4 studies, in which 75% fed calves at least 7 L/d of milk. Cross-sucking is mitigated by providing socially housed calves with an outlet for oral behavior, such as a teat for milk feeding, offering at least 7 L/d of milk, offering a teat with starter, and forage. We recommend that future studies investigating social housing utilize validated clinical scoring systems for calf health monitoring, report disease diagnostic criteria, and feed ≥ 7 L/d of milk to promote performance benefits in pair-housed calves. More research is needed to understand how cross-sucking develops as a habit in socially housed calves.

Keywords: animal welfare; bovine respiratory disease; calf; diarrhea; social housing; validated clinical scoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A PRISMA flowchart (92) illustrating the methodology used to identify articles for inclusion in this literature review investigating pair and triplet housing of dairy calves and health outcomes since 2016.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A PRISMA flowchart (92) illustrating the methodology used to identify articles for inclusion in this literature review investigating pair and triplet housing of dairy calves and growth performance outcomes since 2016.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A PRISMA flowchart (92) illustrating the methodology used to identify articles for inclusion in this literature review investigating strategies to mitigate cross-sucking in socially housed calves.

References

    1. Webster AJF, Saville C, Church BM, Gnanasakthy A, Moss R. Some effects of different rearing systems on health, cleanliness and injury in calves. Br Vet J. (1985) 141:472–83. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(85)90042-9, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doyle SB, Wickens CL, Van Os JMC, Miller-Cushon EK. Producer perceptions of dairy calf management, behavior, and welfare. J Dairy Sci. (2024) 107:363. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24363, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costa JHC, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Invited review: effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health. J Dairy Sci. (2016) 99:2453–67. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10144, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salter RS, Reuscher KJ, Van Os JMC. Milk- and starter-feeding strategies to reduce cross sucking in pair-housed calves in outdoor hutches. J Dairy Sci. (2021) 104:6096–112. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19380, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mahendran SA, Wathes DC, Booth RE, Blackie N. Effects of the individual and pair housing of calves on long-term heifer production on a UK commercial dairy farm. Animals. (2024) 14:125. doi: 10.3390/ani14010125, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources