Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 13;12(3):e70348.
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70348. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Clinical outcomes of kinematically aligned medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

Francesco Bosco  1   2 , Giorgio Cacciola  3 , Virginia Masoni  3 , Carmelo Burgio  4 , Mariazzurra Carlino  5 , Michele Centola  6 , Ferdinando Tosto  6 , Daniele Vezza  6 , Lawrence Camarda  1 , Luigi Sabatini  6
Affiliations
Review

Clinical outcomes of kinematically aligned medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

Francesco Bosco et al. J Exp Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) focuses on restoring the natural joint line and ligament balance, potentially improving biomechanics and outcomes over mechanical alignment (MA). The medial pivot (MP) implant enhances joint stability by mimicking physiological knee motion. Still, its role within a KA protocol and the effects of retaining versus sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, functional outcomes and biomechanical benefits of KA-TKA with MP implants based on the available literature. It also aimed to assess whether PCL retention or sacrifice leads to better postoperative function.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to January 2025 identified studies assessing KA-TKA with MP implants. Primary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), complication rates and implant survivorship. Subgroup analysis compared PCL retention and sacrifice.

Results: Fourteen studies (955 patients) met inclusion criteria. KA-TKA with MP implants resulted in significant ROM improvements (+11.35°, increased to +12.50° after sensitivity analysis) and enhanced PROMs (Oxford Knee Score +18.23, increased to +22.27 after sensitivity analysis; Knee Society Score [KSS] +49.61, functional KSS +42.50). No aseptic loosening or implant failures were reported. PCL sacrifice was associated with greater postoperative flexion (125.4° ± 12.1° vs. 116.4° ± 11.8°, p < 0.001), but functional outcomes were comparable.

Conclusions: KA-TKA with MP implants improves functional recovery, patient satisfaction, and short- to mid-term survivorship, supporting its adoption as a viable alternative to conventional TKA. Further long-term, randomized trials are needed to optimize PCL management and confirm its durability.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Keywords: biomechanics; kinematic alignment; medial pivot; posterior cruciate ligament; total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of the studies included in the analysis. KA, kinematic alignment; TKA, total knee arthroplasty.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Assessment of the risk of bias of the individual studies included in the analysis according to the ROBINS‐I tool.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot. Comparison of Flexion Range results between preoperative and postoperative values. Giustra #1: PCL retained; Giustra #2: PCL sacrificed; Elorza #1: BiC; Elorza #2: MC; Cacciola #1: Reduced slope; Cacciola #2: Native slope. BiC, ball‐in‐socket; CI, confidence interval; MC, medial conformity; p, p‐value; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot. Comparison of KSS results between preoperative and postoperative values. Giustra #1: PCL retained; Giustra #2: PCL sacrificed. CI, confidence interval; KSS, Knee Society Score; p, p‐value; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot. Comparison of Oxford results between preoperative and postoperative values. Elorza #1: BiC; Elorza #2: MC. BiC, ball‐in‐socket; CI, confidence interval; MC, medial conformity; p, p‐value; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot. Comparison of functional KSS results between preoperative and postoperative values. Giustra #1: PCL retained; Giustra #2: PCL sacrificed. CI, confidence interval; KSS, Knee Society Score; p, p‐value; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot. Sensitivity analysis. Comparison of flexion range results between preoperative and postoperative values after exclusion of outlier studies. Giustra #2: PCL sacrificed; Elorza #1: BiC; Elorza #2: MC; Cacciola #1: Reduced slope; Cacciola #2: Native slope. BiC, ball‐in‐socket; CI, confidence interval; MC, medial conformity; p, p value; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot. Sensitivity analysis. Comparison of Oxford results between preoperative and postoperative values after exclusion of outlier studies. CI, confidence interval; p, p value; SD, standard deviation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Alessio‐Mazzola M, Clemente A, Russo A, Mertens P, Burastero G, Formica M, et al. Clinical radiographic outcomes and survivorship of medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(11):3437–3448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer L, Niethammer TR, Thorwächter C, Woiczinski M, Müller PE, Simon F, et al. Improved quadriceps efficiency with a medial pivot in comparison to a cruciate‐retaining design in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025; 33(7):2527–2536. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer L, Woiczinski M, Thorwächter C, Müller PE, Holzapfel BM, Niethammer TR, et al. Influence of kinematic alignment on femorotibial kinematics in medial stabilized TKA design compared to mechanical alignment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143:4339–4347. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bieganowski T, Fiedler B, Singh V, Karlin E, Anil U, Rozell J, et al. Does retention of the posterior cruciate ligament lead to a more “forgotten joint” following total knee arthroplasty? Surg Technol Int. 2022;40:329–334. - PubMed
    1. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence‐based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):305–310. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources