Evaluation of Loading Stresses on Multiunit Abutments in Short Implants - An In vitro Study
- PMID: 40655809
- PMCID: PMC12244603
- DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1946_24
Evaluation of Loading Stresses on Multiunit Abutments in Short Implants - An In vitro Study
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to measure the displacement of straight abutment and multiunit abutment with straight abutment after static loading of 200 N at 30-, 40-, and 45-degree angulations.
Materials and methods: 30 implants were divided into two groups according to the abutment used: Group I - Implant with straight abutments; Group II - Implant with multiunit with straight abutments. Fracture load was determined using a compression load on the abutments with a universal testing machine.
Results: The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Post Hoc test. A significant difference was noted between the groups (P ≤ 0.05). Short implants adequately took up static loading and may be advocated. Minimum displacement occurred in Groups I and II at static loading of 200 N in 30- and 40-degree angulation, which was statistically significant. Maximum displacement occurred in Groups I and II at static loading of 200 N in 45-degree angulation.
Conclusion: Multiunits may improve the crown height space and reduce stress concentration at implant abutment junction. Within the limits of the study, it may be concluded that short implants may be advocated with straight abutment and/or multiunit with straight abutment.
Keywords: Abutments; fatigue failure; short implants.
Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Influence of abutment types on the success of two-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis and fatigue test combined with microleakage evaluation.J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jun 27:S0022-3913(25)00521-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.06.006. Online ahead of print. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. PMID: 40581521
-
Reliability of the Implant Stability Measurement Performed at the Abutment Level. A Retrospective Clinical Trial and an In Vitro Research.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025 Jul 25;40(4):477-487. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10977. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025. PMID: 39641908
-
Micro-CT Evaluation of Screw Deformation After Quasi-Static Loading of Titanium-Base and Multi-Unit Abutments at Different Implant Angulations.Int J Dent. 2025 Jun 13;2025:2519930. doi: 10.1155/ijod/2519930. eCollection 2025. Int J Dent. 2025. PMID: 40546448 Free PMC article.
-
Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016. PMID: 27239815
-
Comparative Evaluation of Stress at the Implant Bone Interface Between Short Implants and Long Implants Using BioHPP Abutment- An In vitro Study.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1107-S1110. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_370_25. Epub 2025 Jun 18. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025. PMID: 40655788 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- The glossary of prosthodontic term. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:10–92. - PubMed
-
- Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of the subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. J Prosthetic Dent. 2008;99:107–13. - PubMed
-
- Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Periodontology. 2000;66:72–96. - PubMed
-
- Gonçalves TM, Bortolini S, Martinolli M, Alfenas BF, Peruzzo DC, Natali A, et al. Long-term short implants performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the essential assessment parameters. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:325–36. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources