Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1229-S1232.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1640_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review

Smitha Sharan et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic computer-aided surgery (DCAS) for zygomatic implant placement by analyzing implant placement accuracy, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of databases was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2024 comparing DCAS-assisted zygomatic implant placement with traditional methods, extracting data and assessing quality.

Results: Five studies were included. DCAS significantly enhances implant placement accuracy, reduces complications, and increases patient satisfaction, with robotic systems demonstrating superior accuracy and stability compared to dynamic navigation systems.

Conclusion: DCAS offers a promising approach for zygomatic implant placement, enhancing accuracy, safety, and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to explore long-term benefits and limitations.

Keywords: Accuracy; clinical outcomes; complications; dynamic computer-aided surgery (DCAS); implant placement; zygomatic implant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart

Similar articles

References

    1. Gracher AHP, de Moura MB, da Silva Peres P, Thomé G, Padovan LEM, Trojan LC. Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: A systematic review. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7:17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pisoni L, Ordesi P, Siervo P, Bianchi AF, Persia M, Siervo S. Flapless versus traditional dental implant surgery: Long-term evaluation of crestal bone resorption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1354–9. - PubMed
    1. Kuo PJ, Lin CY, Hung TF, Chiu HC, Kuo HY. A novel application of dynamic guided navigation system in immediate implant placement. J Dent Sci. 2022;17:354–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tao B, Shen Y, Sun Y, Huang W, Wang F, Wu Y. Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22:747–55. - PubMed
    1. Zhou W, Fan S, Wang F, Huang W, Jamjoom FZ, Wu Y. A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50:116–20. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources