Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 40655835
- PMCID: PMC12244975
- DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1640_24
Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic computer-aided surgery (DCAS) for zygomatic implant placement by analyzing implant placement accuracy, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of databases was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2024 comparing DCAS-assisted zygomatic implant placement with traditional methods, extracting data and assessing quality.
Results: Five studies were included. DCAS significantly enhances implant placement accuracy, reduces complications, and increases patient satisfaction, with robotic systems demonstrating superior accuracy and stability compared to dynamic navigation systems.
Conclusion: DCAS offers a promising approach for zygomatic implant placement, enhancing accuracy, safety, and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to explore long-term benefits and limitations.
Keywords: Accuracy; clinical outcomes; complications; dynamic computer-aided surgery (DCAS); implant placement; zygomatic implant.
Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of freehand surgery, static and dynamic computer assisted surgery on zygomatic implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analyses.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Apr;53(4):301-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.12.002. Epub 2024 Dec 20. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025. PMID: 39709308
-
Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33635397
-
Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 20;60(1):11. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010011. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 38276045 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery.Periodontol 2000. 2023 Feb;91(1):89-112. doi: 10.1111/prd.12440. Epub 2022 Jul 30. Periodontol 2000. 2023. PMID: 35906928
-
Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years.J Dent. 2023 Aug;135:104567. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104567. Epub 2023 May 30. J Dent. 2023. PMID: 37263412
References
-
- Pisoni L, Ordesi P, Siervo P, Bianchi AF, Persia M, Siervo S. Flapless versus traditional dental implant surgery: Long-term evaluation of crestal bone resorption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1354–9. - PubMed
-
- Tao B, Shen Y, Sun Y, Huang W, Wang F, Wu Y. Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22:747–55. - PubMed
-
- Zhou W, Fan S, Wang F, Huang W, Jamjoom FZ, Wu Y. A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50:116–20. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources