Provider Experiences With Systematically Administered Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Sub-Study
- PMID: 40656127
- PMCID: PMC12253963
- DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200486
Provider Experiences With Systematically Administered Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Sub-Study
Abstract
Background and objectives: There has been interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to capture and systematically assess patients' perceptions of their multiple sclerosis (MS) experience and feed this information back to the clinician, but PROMs are not routinely used in MS outpatient clinics. We explored the perspectives of providers caring for persons with MS (PwMS) on the integration of PROMs into clinical practice.
Methods: This was a qualitative substudy of a separate randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0497954) examining the effect of PROM use on depression and anxiety levels in PwMS. We conducted semistructured interviews with 10 providers caring for participants enrolled in the study and explored their experiences using PROMs with PwMS. Thematic analysis through a mixed inductive and deductive approach was performed using verbatim interview transcriptions.
Results: Seven neurologists, 2 specialty MS nurse practitioners, and 1 MS registered nurse were interviewed. Providers expressed several facilitating factors with PROM usage, including engaging with patient-specific symptoms, initiating patient goal setting, and improving visit efficiency and patient satisfaction. However, providers also expressed barriers such as clinical workflow disruptions and technological barriers, skepticism toward the validity of results, and moral/ethical obligations to information gained from PROMs. Future opportunities elicited were the introduction of previsit PROMs and direct integration of PROMs into the electronic health record.
Discussion: From an MS provider's perspective, PROMs offer useful information but barriers continue to exist. PROMs have promise as an adjunct tool in the care of PwMS to optimize their functioning and experiences as health care system users, and these results may inform future strategic implementation of routine PROMs in MS clinics.
Trial registration information: This trial was registered on July 28, 2021, at the NIH United States National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical Trial ID: NCT04979546.
© 2025 American Academy of Neurology.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: N.Y.C. receives fellowship funding from the Canadian Network of Multiple Sclerosis Clinics (via unrestricted educational grants from EMD Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen, Hoffmann-La Roche and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.); and has received travel and accommodation funding from Alexion. R.T.T. has received arms-length investigator-initiated research grants from Sanofi, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer; and has been a consultant for Novo-Nordisk, Merck, Shoppers Drug Mart, and Emergent Biosolutions. P.S.S. receives grants/research support from Biogen Pharmaceuticals and MS Canada; and has received speakers bureau/honoraria/consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Roche Canada, STEDT, Biogen Idec Canada, EMD Serono, and Sanofi Genzyme Canada. The remaining authors have nothing to declare. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
References
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical