Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Jun 11;17(6):e85793.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.85793. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Wet Tap-Induced Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial Failure in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Case Report Highlighting Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Treatment-Resistant Pain

Affiliations
Case Reports

Wet Tap-Induced Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial Failure in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Case Report Highlighting Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Treatment-Resistant Pain

Shivang Patel et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

A 59-year-old female with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) following multiple lumbar surgeries underwent a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial for chronic pain management. However, the trial failed due to severe nausea, vomiting, and postural headaches secondary to unintentional dural puncture (wet tap) during lead placement. This resulted in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, low-pressure headaches, and subsequent trial intolerance, necessitating early lead removal. Given her failed response to conservative treatments, neuropathic medications, and systemic opioids, an intrathecal pump (ITP) trial was pursued, yielding 90% pain relief and leading to permanent pump implantation. This case highlights the impact of procedural complications on neuromodulation outcomes and the role of intrathecal drug delivery as an alternative in patients who cannot tolerate SCS.

Keywords: failed back surgery syndrome (fbss); intrathecal pump therapy; neuromodulation therapies; spinal cord stimulation (scs); unintentional dural puncture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Lateral lumbar X-ray view demonstrating intrathecal catheter tip placement. The black arrow on the left highlights the path of the catheter extending toward the spinal canal.

Similar articles

References

    1. The epidemiology and economic consequences of pain. Henschke N, Kamper SJ, Maher CG. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:139–147. - PubMed
    1. Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation. North RB, Campbell JN, James CS, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1831546/ Neurosurgery. 1991;28:685–691. - PubMed
    1. Orhurhu VJ, Chu R, Gill J. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Failed back surgery syndrome. - PubMed
    1. Etiology, evaluation, and treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Sebaaly A, Lahoud MJ, Rizkallah M, Kreichati G, Kharrat K. Asian Spine J. 2018;12:574–585. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Failed back surgery syndrome-terminology, etiology, prevention, evaluation, and management: a narrative review. Yeo J. J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2024;41:166–178. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources