Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 28;3(3):e70024.
doi: 10.1002/cesm.70024. eCollection 2025 May.

Cochrane's COVID-19 Living Systematic Reviews: A Mixed-Methods Study of Their Conduct, Reporting and Currency

Kevindu De Silva  1 , Tari Turner  1 , Steve McDonald  1
Affiliations

Cochrane's COVID-19 Living Systematic Reviews: A Mixed-Methods Study of Their Conduct, Reporting and Currency

Kevindu De Silva et al. Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. .

Abstract

Background: Living systematic reviews (LSRs) should provide up-to-date evidence for priority questions where the evidence may be uncertain and fast-moving. LSRs featured prominently during COVID-19 and formed part of Cochrane's response to the pandemic. We conducted a mixed-methods study to describe the characteristics of Cochrane's COVID-19 living reviews, determine the currency of the included evidence, and evaluate authors' experiences in conducting and publishing these reviews.

Methods: We identified living reviews of COVID-19 from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and extracted data on the number of versions published and publication timelines. We assessed the currency of evidence by comparing studies included in the reviews against a comprehensive list of studies maintained for the Australian living guidelines for COVID-19. The qualitative component involved semi-structured interviews with review authors to identify the barriers and enablers to conducting, reporting and publishing living reviews.

Findings: Cochrane published 25 COVID-19 living systematic reviews. Half of these reviews had not been updated when assessed in June 2023 and only four had been updated more than once. A total of 118 studies were included in the living reviews. We estimated that an additional 119 studies were available and potentially relevant for inclusion. Interviews with six authors indicated that publication timelines were reduced by editorial delays, loss of funding, waning commitment, and the burden of screening search results. An inability to communicate the living status of reviews in the Cochrane Library was a common frustration for many authors. Although authors felt the conclusions of their reviews were still current, only one living review communicated its updated status and made new evidence accessible after the review was published.

Conclusions: Maintaining and communicating the currency of Cochrane's COVID-19 living systematic reviews was not feasible for many author teams because of author-side, editorial and platform barriers.

Keywords: COVID‐19; Cochrane; living systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

TT and SM developed Cochrane's guidance for living systematic reviews, evaluated Cochrane's pre‐pandemic LSR pilot, and are co‐authors of Cochrane living reviews unrelated to COVID‐19. Both have Cochrane editorial roles – TT is a member of the Cochrane Library Editorial Board and SM is a member of the Cochrane search peer review panel. All authors are associated with the Australian Living Evidence Collaboration.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Hoffmann F., Allers K., Rombey T., et al., “Nearly 80 Systematic Reviews Were Published Each Day: Observational Study on Trends in Epidemiology and Reporting Over the Years 2000–2019,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 138 (2021): 1–11. - PubMed
    1. Shojania K. G., Sampson M., Ansari M. T., Ji J., Doucette S., and Moher D., “How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis,” Annals of Internal Medicine 147, no. 4 (2007): 224–233. - PubMed
    1. Elliott J. H., Synnot A., Turner T., et al., “Living Systematic Review: 1. Introduction‐the Why, What, When, and How,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 91 (2017): 23–30. - PubMed
    1. Elliott J. H., Turner T., Clavisi O., et al., “Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence‐Practice gap,” PLoS Medicine 11, no. 2 (2014): e1001603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Living systematic reviews Cochrane Community: Cochrane Community; 2023 [Available from: https://community.cochrane.org/review-production/production-resources/li....

LinkOut - more resources