Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;69(7):700-709.
doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1338_24. Epub 2025 Jun 12.

Evaluation of the correlation between pre-anaesthetic P-POSSUM score, ultrasound muscle assessment and frailty index on perioperative outcome - An observational trial

Affiliations

Evaluation of the correlation between pre-anaesthetic P-POSSUM score, ultrasound muscle assessment and frailty index on perioperative outcome - An observational trial

Sanchi Sunil Bhalerao et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: Bedside muscle ultrasonography has emerged as a clinical tool for sarcopenia and perioperative outcomes. We aimed to find a correlation between the pre-anaesthetic Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM), Fried Frailty Phenotype (FrFP) and ultrasound-guided (USG) muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) with morbidity and mortality outcomes in elective surgeries.

Methods: This prospective observational trial included 150 patients aged 18-80 years undergoing low-risk (n = 50), intermediate-risk (n = 50), and high-risk (n = 50) surgeries. Preoperative P-POSSUM scores, USG CSA of psoas major and rectus femoris muscles and FrFP were recorded. Postoperative outcomes on days 1, 2 and 3 and then until patient discharge were observed. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Demographics of patients were similar in age, gender, weight, body mass index and pre-frail status. A strong correlation coefficient was observed for physiological score, operative severity score, CSA of psoas major and CSA of rectus femoris. A weak strength correlation coefficient was observed between FrFP and CSA of psoas major, regarding 30-day morbidity and mortality. The area under the curve (AUC) - 0.74 for psoas major had moderate predictive ability, and AUC-0.84 for rectus femoris showed a strong predictive ability against 30-day mortality in high-risk surgeries. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test analysis revealed a mortality ratio of 0.98.

Conclusion: P-POSSUM and CSA of psoas major and rectus femoris had a statistically significant positive correlation to predict perioperative 30-day mortality in survivor versus non-survivor patients of high-risk surgeries.

Keywords: Frailty scores; Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity; morbidity; mortality; muscle ultrasound; postoperative outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC of P-POSSUM against 30-day mortality in low-risk (a), intermediate-risk (b) and high-risk (c) surgeries. ROC of frailty scores against 30-day mortality in low-risk (d), intermediate-risk (e) and high-risk (f) surgeries. ROC of cross-sectional area of psoas major and rectus femoris muscles against 30-day mortality in low-risk (g), intermediate-risk (h) and high-risk (i) surgeries. P-POSSUM=portsmouth physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity, ROC=receiver operating characteristic
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC of P-POSSUM, frailty and ultrasound-guided CSA of psoas major and rectus femoris against 30-day mortality in all 150 patients (a) Survivor patients (n = 30) of high-risk group (b) Mortality patients (n = 20) of high-risk group (c). Kaplan–Meier survivor analysis in 150 patients undergoing low, intermediate and high-risk surgeries (d) CSA=cross-sectional area, P-POSSUM=portsmouth physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity, ROC=receiver operating characteristic

References

    1. Panayi AC, Orkaby AR, Sakthivel D, Endo Y, Varon D, Roh D, et al. Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2019;218:393–400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briggs R, McDonough A, Ellis G, Bennett K, O’Neill D, Robinson D. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for community-dwelling, high-risk, frail, older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;5:CD012705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012705.pub2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. To TL, Doan TN, Ho WC, Liao WC. Prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling older adults in Asian Countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:895. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050895. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: Implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019;394:1365–75. - PubMed
    1. Picca A, Coelho-Junior HJ, Calvani R, Marzetti E, Vetrano DL. Biomarkers shared by frailty and sarcopenia in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;73:101530. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101530. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources