Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025;24(3):253-279.
doi: 10.1080/15298868.2025.2467737. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

Openness to Being Gossiped About: Understanding Gossip from the Target's Perspective

Affiliations

Openness to Being Gossiped About: Understanding Gossip from the Target's Perspective

Andrew H Hales et al. Self Identity. 2025.

Abstract

It is often assumed that, if given the choice, people would prefer not to be gossiped about. We address this assumption by investigating reactions to gossip from the perspective of its potential targets. In two nationally representative samples, we assess whether people are ever open to being the topic of other people's gossip and find a general aversion to being talked about, unless positively. However, some people reliably do prefer to be the focus of gossip: A meta-analytic summary showed that being male, and more narcissistic predicted a greater desire to be the focus of gossip, even when that gossip is negative. And, older adults had lower desire to be positively gossiped about. We also test in confirmatory experiments whether people correctly perceive others' preferences, and find that people overestimate the extent to which others want to be gossiped about, but only when the gossip is positive.

Keywords: age; gender; gossip; narcissism; ostracism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Aronson E (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In Abelson R, Aronson E, McGuire W, Newcomb T, Rosenberg M, & Tannenbaum P (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
    1. Aronson E (1998). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In Harmon-Jones E & Mills JS (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance theory: Revival with revisions and controversies (pp. 21–36. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/0000135-007 - DOI
    1. Badura KL, Grijalva E, Newman DA, Yan TT, & Jeon G (2018). Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model. Personnel Psychology, 71(3), 335–367. 10.1111/peps.12266 - DOI
    1. Balliet D, Wu J, & Van Lange PAM (2021). Indirect reciprocity, gossip, and reputation-based cooperation. In Van Lange PAM, Higgins ET, & Kruglanski AW (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. Third Edition. (pp. 265–287). New York: Guilford.
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, & Walker S (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI