Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 23;16(9):2890-2902.
doi: 10.7150/jca.111555. eCollection 2025.

Radioresistant triple-negative breast cancer cells release β-catenin containing extracellular vesicles to promote cancer stem cell activity of bystanders

Affiliations

Radioresistant triple-negative breast cancer cells release β-catenin containing extracellular vesicles to promote cancer stem cell activity of bystanders

Yueh-Chun Lee et al. J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) frequently develops radioresistance, yet the mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. This study is the first to investigate how β-catenin, transported by extracellular vesicles (EVs) from radioresistant TNBC cells, promotes radioresistance and enhances cancer stem cell (CSC) activity in recipient TNBC cells, offering a novel mechanism distinct from prior EV-related findings in other cancers. Methods and Results: A radioresistant cell line (231-RR) was developed from MDA-MB-231 cells, and EVs were isolated for characterization. EVs from 231-RR cells decreased radiosensitivity in parental MDA-MB-231 and two other TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-468 and Hs578T), as shown by clonogenic assay. These EVs also enhanced CSC activity in MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cells, demonstrated through primary and secondary mammosphere formation. The effects were nullified when using EVs from 231-RR cells treated with the EV secretion inhibitor GW4869. 231-RR-derived EVs showed elevated β-catenin levels and increased active β-catenin and stemness proteins (c-Myc, OCT4, SOX2) in recipient TNBC cells. The β-catenin inhibitor CCT-031374 prevented EV-mediated enhancement of radioresistance and CSC activity. Public data analysis from breast cancer patients revealed post-radiotherapy upregulation of the β-catenin pathway, with elevated CTNNB1, MYC, and CD44 expression, alongside reduced CDKN2A and CDH1 levels, supporting clinical relevance. Conclusions: This study uniquely demonstrates that EVs from radioresistant TNBC cells transfer β-catenin to confer radioresistance and enhance CSC activity in recipient cells, a mechanism not previously reported in TNBC. These findings suggest the potential of EV-β-catenin derived as a novel biomarker for predicting radiotherapy outcomes and recurrence risk in TNBC patients, pending development of sensitive detection methods.

Keywords: cancer stem cells; extracellular vesicles; radioresistance; triple negative breast cancer; β-catenin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells exhibit enhanced radioresistance, elevated CSC activity, and reduced irradiation-induced DNA damage. (A) Clonogenic survival assay comparing parental MDA-MB-231 (231-P) and radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells (231-RR) following exposure to increasing doses of ionizing radiation (0-6 Gy). Representative images of crystal violet-stained colonies are shown for each condition. (B, C) Representative images of primary and secondary tumorspheres are shown in (B). Each panel includes both low magnification (10× objective) and high magnification (40× objective) views. Enlarged tumorspheres correspond to regions marked with red dashed boxes in the low-magnification images. Scale bar = 100 µm in high-magnification images. Quantification of primary and secondary tumorsphere formation in 231-P and 231-RR cells are shown in (C). Data are presented as mean ± SD. ***, P < 0.001 compared to 231-P. (D) Western blot analysis of γ-H2AX expression in 231-P and 231-RR cells as a marker of DNA double-strand breaks following radiation exposure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EVs released from radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells contain high levels of β-catenin protein. (A) Schematic flowchart illustrating the collection and isolation EVs from TNBC cells. NTA, nanoparticle tracking analysis; TEM, transmission electron microscope; WB, western blot. (B, C) Characterization of EVs from 231-P (B) and 231-RR (C) by NTA (upper panels) and TEM (lower panels). Mean particle size and concentration (± SD) are indicated. Representative TEM images of EVs are shown at 30,000× and 60,000× magnification. Scale bars: 200 nm or 100 nm as indicated. (D)Western blot analysis of EV markers, including Alix, HSP70, and CD9, confirming positive identification of EVs. Calnexin, a negative marker for EVs, was included to verify the absence of non-EV contaminants. GAPDH was used as a control for whole cell lysates (WCL), and Ponceau S staining of the EV blot membrane served as a loading control. EVs were also examined from cells treated with 1 µM GW4869 (GW), an inhibitor of EV formation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
EVs from radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells induce a radioresistant phenotype. (A, B) Extracellular vesicles from radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells (231-RR-EVs) were labeled with the lipophilic green fluorescent dye DiO. Uptake of 20 µg DiO-labeled 231-RR-EVs by parental MDA-MB-231 cells was examined using confocal microscopy (A) and flow cytometry (B). MDA-MB-468 cell uptake was also analyzed by flow cytometry (B). Cells directly labeled with DiO served as a positive control (PC). PBS with the addition of 2 ug/ml Dio dye at a concentration of 2 ug/ml was also filtered through a 100KDa Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter to dead volume and collected as a negative control (NC). (C) The effect of 231-RR-EVs on the radiosensitivity of parental MDA-MB-231 cells was assessed using a clonogenic assay. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 50 µg or 100 µg of 231-RR-EVs for 24 hours prior to exposure to the indicated doses of radiation. (D, E) MDA-MB-468 (D) or Hs578T (E) cells were treated with 231-RR-EVs at a concentration of 100 µg followed by irradiation at the indicated doses. The radiosensitivity was determined by clonogenic assay. (F) MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with EVs from parental cells (231-P-EV), radioresistant cells (RR-EV), or from GW4869-treated cells (231-P-GW-EV, RR-GW-EV) at a concentration of 100 µg for 24 hours, followed by irradiation at 2 Gy. Colonies were visualized by crystal violet staining and counted 14 days post-seeding. Data are presented as relative colony numbers compared to the untreated control (Ctrl) without irradiation. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
EVs from radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells enhance the expression of cancer stemness proteins and CSC activity. (A) Parental MDA-MB-231 (231-P), MDA-MB-468, or Hs578T cells were treated with 100 µg of EVs derived from radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells (231-RR-EVs) for 48 hours. The expression of cancer stemness-related proteins, including β-catenin, active β-catenin, OCT4, c-Myc, and SOX2, was analyzed by western blot. (B, C) Parental MDA-MB-231 (B) or Hs578T (C) cells were treated with 100 µg of EVs isolated from 231-P cells (231-P-EVs) for 24 hours. Representative images of mammospheres are shown (left), along with quantification of mammosphere formation efficiency (right). Each image panel includes both low magnification (20× objective) and high magnification (40× objective) images. Enlarged views correspond to areas marked with red dashed boxes in the low-magnification images. Scale bar = 100 µm in high-magnification images. **, P< 0.01; ***, P< 0.001. (D) Parental 231-P cells were treated with EVs from 231-P, 231-RR, or GW4869-treated cells (231-P-GW-EVs or RR-GW-EVs), followed by primary mammosphere formation. After 7 days, primary mammospheres were collected using 100 µm strainers, dissociated with Accutase, and single-cell suspensions were used for secondary mammosphere formation assays. Representative images include low magnification (10× objective) and high magnification (40× objective) views, with enlarged images highlighting areas marked with red dashed boxes. Scale bar = 100 µm in high-magnification images. Quantification of both primary and secondary mammosphere formation efficiency is shown. ***, P < 0.001. (E) The protein expression levels of active β-catenin, c-Myc, and SOX2 were assessed by western blot in 231-P cells treated with 100 µg EVs of 231-P, 231-RR, or GW4869 treated cells (231-P-GW-EVs or RR-GW-EVs) for 48 hours. Ratios indicated the relative expression compared to untreated control cells (ctrl).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Nuclear delivery of β-catenin by EVs released from radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells (231-RR) were transfected with a plasmid encoding GFP-tagged β-catenin (pLVX-CTNNB1-GFP) for 24 hours, followed by puromycin selection. Whole cell lysates (WCL) and EVs released from 231-RR cells, with or without GFP-tagged β-catenin expression, were collected. Western blot analysis was performed to detect the indicated proteins. (B) Parental MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 100 µg of EVs from 231-RR cells expressing GFP-tagged β-catenin for 2 hours. GFP expression was detected by immunocytochemical staining using an anti-GFP antibody, followed by confocal microscopy with a magnification of 630X. Arrows indicate positive GFP signals within the cell nucleus. FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG was used as a control. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Inhibition of β-catenin activity abolishes the effects of EVs from radioresistant cells. Parental MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 100 µg of EVs from radioresistant MDA-MB-231 cells (RR-EV). (A) After 24 hours of treatment, cells were irradiated with 2 or 4 Gy, and colony-forming ability was assessed by clonogenic assay with or without the β-catenin inhibitor CCT-031374 (CCT) at a concentration of 5 µM. **, P< 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (B) After 24 hours of treatment, CSC activity was measured by mammosphere formation assay with the CCT-031374 treatment (CCT, 5 µM). 0.1% DMSO was used as the vehicle control. Each image panel includes both low magnification (20× objective) and high magnification (40× objective) images. Enlarged views correspond to areas marked with red dashed boxes in the low-magnification images. Scale bar = 100 µm in high-magnification images. **, P< 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Scale bars, 100 μm. (C) After 48 hours of EV treatment in MDA-MB-231 (231-P) or Hs578T cells, with or without CCT-031374 at concentrations of 2.5 µM or 5 µM, total cellular proteins were extracted, and the expression levels of active β-catenin, BMI1, c-Myc, and SOX2 were analyzed by western blotting. GAPDH was used as a house keeping gene. Inserted numbers represent as relative levels compared to non-treated cells.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Changes in β-catenin-related gene expression in breast cancer tissues after radio-therapy. Gene expression data from the GSE59733 dataset were obtained from the GEO database. Expression levels of CTNNB1 (A), MYC (B), and CD44 (C), which are upregulated by β-catenin activation, were compared between breast cancer tissue samples collected before (Pre-RT) and after (Post-RT) radiotherapy. In addition, the expression levels of CDKN2A (D) and CDH1 (E), which are downregulated by β-catenin activation, were similarly compared. Statistically significant differences in expression levels are indicated with p-values.

Similar articles

References

    1. Onitilo AA, Engel JM, Greenlee RT, Mukesh BN. Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival. Clin Med Res. 2009;7:4–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almansour NM. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Brief Review About Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Treatment and Role of Artificial Intelligence. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:836417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, Sanders ME, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:674–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar P, Aggarwal R. An overview of triple-negative breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293:247–69. - PubMed
    1. Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M, Kearney T, Higgins SA, Weidhaas J. et al. Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5652–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources