Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 14.
doi: 10.1177/21565333251359617. Online ahead of print.

Current Practices in the Use of Anti-Mullerian Hormone for Surveillance of Ovarian Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Report from the Pediatric and Adolescent Committee of the Oncofertility Consortium

Affiliations

Current Practices in the Use of Anti-Mullerian Hormone for Surveillance of Ovarian Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Report from the Pediatric and Adolescent Committee of the Oncofertility Consortium

Kari Bjornard et al. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a surrogate measure to assess ovarian reserve in childhood cancer survivors, but consensus is lacking on when to obtain and how to use AMH data. Methods: Pediatric and adolescent committee (PAC) members of the Oncofertility Consortium were invited by email to complete a survey regarding ovarian reserve surveillance and their use of AMH. Responses were collected through REDCap, and results were stratified by specialty: pediatric oncology and endocrinology (PED) or adult/pediatric gynecology and reproductive endocrinology (GYN). Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis using SAS v9.4. Results: Surveys were completed by 48 of 123 eligible PAC members (28 PED, 19 GYN, response rate 39%). The majority (83.3%) reported using AMH as a measure of ovarian reserve, with the earliest timepoint to begin AMH surveillance to be 12-23 months from therapy completion (63%). While most respondents felt the benefits of testing outweighed the limitations (78.7%), commonly reported limitations included variability of results (60.4%) and lack of standardization in use of AMH (52.1%). Differences between PED and GYN respondents included how AMH was used among their clinical practice and the timing of laboratory evaluation. Conclusions: Most respondents indicated they used AMH; however, practices in its application varied depending on specialty backgrounds. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines would improve the standardization of surveillance and counseling and prevent missed opportunities for fertility preservation in survivorship.

Keywords: AMH; ovarian reserve; surveillance; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources