Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e104897.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104897.

Prevention of extubation failure in neurocritical care patients with residual disorder of consciousness: the Brain-Injured Patients Extubation Readiness (BIPER) study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial

Affiliations

Prevention of extubation failure in neurocritical care patients with residual disorder of consciousness: the Brain-Injured Patients Extubation Readiness (BIPER) study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial

Russell Chabanne et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: In the intensive care unit (ICU), brain-injured patients are frequently exposed to mechanical ventilation to protect the brain and preserve physiology. After intracranial pressure control and sedation withdrawal, this population is prone to residual disorder of consciousness and altered neurological control of respiratory drive, cough and airway protection. Consequently, extubation failure is more frequent than in general ICU patients, and there is no clear evidence-based clinical trigger for extubation. Different risk factors for extubation failure were described in observational trials, and clinical scores were constructed to detect patients at higher risk of extubation failure. Nevertheless, none of these scores were prospectively tested as interventional tools to prevent extubation failure. The Brain-Injured Patients Extubation Readiness (BIPER) study is an ongoing multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial aiming to test one of these scores as an intervention protocol to decrease extubation failure in neurocritical care patients with residual disorder of consciousness.

Methods and analysis: Trial design: Stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial with five groups of three to six clusters (20 ICUs). Groups of clusters are randomised to five possible sequences of nine periods with crossing from a control condition period (usual care for extubation) to an intervention condition period (BIPER-guided extubation protocol), separated by a 3-month transition period.

Participants: Participants are clinically stable brain-injured patients (18-75 years old), requiring more than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation with residual disorder of consciousness after sedation withdrawal, and who achieved a spontaneous breathing trial.

Interventions: The control condition consists of extubation based on usual care and local practice. The intervention condition consists of extubation triggered by a clinical score evaluating deglutition, gag reflex, cough and visual tracking (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Visual Scale).

Objective: To determine whether adoption of an extubation protocol based on a clinical score can lessen extubation failure compared with usual care in brain-injured patients with residual disorder of consciousness.

Outcome: The primary outcome measure is extubation failure, defined within 5 days following extubation. The key secondary outcome measure is time to effective extubation.

Randomisation: Clusters are allocated to sequence of treatments using random blocks randomisation. The constitution of groups of clusters was stratified according to planned recruitment of each centre.

Blinding: Investigators and outcome assessors are not blinded to condition allocation.Number of participants: 660 patients (220 in the control condition and 440 in the intervention condition).

Ethics and dissemination: The BIPER trial was approved by an independent ethics committee. The study began on 9 February 2020, and 571 participants are now included. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed medical journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04080440.

Keywords: Brain Injuries; INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE; Neurological injury; Ventilators, Mechanical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RC reports receiving consulting fees from SOPHYSA and X.O outside the submitted work. ADJ declares fees for presentations for Medtronic, Drager Medical, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Viatris and Sanofi outside the submitted work. EF reports receiving consulting fees from Drager Medical and GE Healthcare, and honorariums for presentation from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare outside the submitted work. J-MC reports receiving consulting fees from Viatris, Amomed, Sedana Medical and Aspen, and honorariums for presentation from Shionogi, Gilead, Aspen, Drager Medical and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare outside the submitted work. MJ reports receiving lecture and consulting fees from AbbVie and Sedana Medical outside the submitted work. All other authors have no competing interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trials diagram of the Brain-Injured Patients Extubation Readiness study. ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Workflow of the Brain-Injured Patients Extubation Readiness (BIPER) study; BI, brain injury; DOC, disorder of consciousness; SBT, spontaneous breathing trial; ZEEP, zero end-expiratory pressure.

References

    1. McConville JF, Kress JP. Weaning patients from the ventilator. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2233–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1203367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA. 2002;287:345–55. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.345. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frisvold SK, Robba C, Guérin C. What respiratory targets should be recommended in patients with brain injury and respiratory failure? Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:683–6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05556-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pelosi P, Ferguson ND, Frutos-Vivar F, et al. Management and outcome of mechanically ventilated neurologic patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1482–92. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821209a8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roquilly A, Cinotti R, Jaber S, et al. Implementation of an evidence-based extubation readiness bundle in 499 brain-injured patients. a before-after evaluation of a quality improvement project. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:958–66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201301-0116OC. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data