Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 14;26(1):159.
doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-02106-z.

Comparing eptinezumab with onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of chronic migraine: a real-world evidence study

Affiliations

Comparing eptinezumab with onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of chronic migraine: a real-world evidence study

Damiana Scuteri et al. J Headache Pain. .

Abstract

Background: Migraine, a spectrum of episodic headache disorders common in the global population, may evolve into a very debilitating chronic condition, usually underdiagnosed, poorly recognized and difficult to manage. Neurotransmission in the trigeminovascular sensory nervous system, particularly involving calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), has emerged as a prime therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic migraine. Here we investigated differences in efficacy of eptinezumab (a monoclonal antibody [mAb] targetting CGRP) and onabotulinumtoxinA (an inhibitor of neurotransmitter release) in an Italian real-world setting in which medical medication overuse headache (MOH) is prevalent.

Methods: Forty chronic migraine patients refractory to standard treatments were observed, of which 15 were over 50 years old, and 4 exceeded 65 years. The primary endpoint of efficacy was reduction of monthly migraine days (MMDs) collected at two time points: after 3 and 6 months, respectively. The secondary endpoints, also performed after 3 and 6 months, include reduction of monthly headache days (MHDs), days in need of rescue medications, diminished pain intensity and on disability measured as Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). Statistical differences were analysed using two-way analysis of variance with measurement repetition tests (Two-way RM ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni or Sidak test).

Results: Both eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA demonstrated efficacy at 3 and 6 months, with no statistically significant differences between them for either primary or secondary endpoints. Both treatments had a more pronounced effect on MMDs and MHDs than on the reduction of intensity and disability, and reduced the need for rescue medications at 3 and 6 months. After 3 months, onabotulinumtoxinA displays a trend to reduce the need to rescue medication in a higher number of patients compared to eptinezumab.

Conclusions: OnabotulinumtoxinA was as effective as eptinezumab for chronic migraine prophylaxis according to both primary and secondary endpoints and, therefore, is useful as an alternative or adjunct therapy to mAbs or gepants.

Keywords: Chronic migraine; Efficacy; Eptinezumab; OnabotulinutoxinA; Pharmacovigilance; Real-world; Rescue medications; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by Calabria Region Ethics Committee with number 303/2024 and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. GWL has received funding from Abbvie Inc. for basic non-clinical research unrelated to the present study. Otherwise, the authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA both significantly reduced MMDs and MHDs, and by comparable extents. Reductions in (A, B) monthly migraine days (MMDs) and (C, D) monthly headache days (MHDs) were experienced by patients treated with eptinezumab or onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) respectively, with no statistically significant difference in the extent of reduction observed between treatment groups for either endpoint. Both treatments are effective across time (****p < 0.0001). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (A, C) and with individual data points shown (B, D)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) did not produce statistically significant reductions in pain intensity (VAS) or disability (MIDAS) after 3 and 6 months of treatment. VAS = Visual Analogue Scale; MIDAS = Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire. Data are expressed as mean ± SD
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) reduced the need for rescue medications after 3 and 6 months of treatment without statistically significant differences. Both treatments are effective across time (****p < 0.0001). Data are expressed as mean ± SD, with the distribution of individual data points also shown

References

    1. Bigal ME, Liberman JN, Lipton RB (2006) Age-dependent prevalence and clinical features of migraine. Neurology 67(2):246–251. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000225186.76323.69 - PubMed
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211. 10.1177/0333102417738202 - PubMed
    1. Villalón CM, Olesen J (2009) The role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and efficacy of CGRP receptor antagonists as acute antimigraine drugs. Pharmacol Ther 124(3):309–323. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.09.003 - PubMed
    1. Alshareef M (2022) Factors associated with Over-the-Counter analgesic overuse among individuals experiencing headache. Clin Pract 12(5):714–722. 10.3390/clinpract12050074 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scuteri D, Corasaniti MT, Tonin P, Bagetta G (2019) Eptinezumab for the treatment of migraine. Drugs Today (Barcelona Spain: 1998) 55(11):695–703. 10.1358/dot.2019.55.11.3069864 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources