Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):1047.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07613-w.

The use of deliberate practice in simulation-based surgical training for laparoscopic surgery - a systematic review

Dakshitha Wickramasinghe  1   2 , Jonathan Vincent  3
Affiliations

The use of deliberate practice in simulation-based surgical training for laparoscopic surgery - a systematic review

Dakshitha Wickramasinghe et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) has necessitated specialized training beyond traditional open surgical methods. Simulation-Based Surgical Training (SBST) offers a promising alternative, but its instructional design varies significantly. Deliberate Practice (DP), a concept originating from expertise research, may enhance SBST effectiveness. This systematic review evaluates the integration of DP within SBST for MIS.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, ERIC, and Google Scholar, covering publications up to January 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies implementing DP in SBST for laparoscopic surgery were included. Data extraction focused on DP elements (task design, feedback, and repetition), learner motivation, training structure, and outcome measures. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the RoB2 and ROBINS-E tools.

Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria, comprising five randomized controlled trials and five observational studies. Study participants were predominantly surgical trainees, with training programs utilizing box trainers or virtual reality simulators. DP-informed SBST was consistently associated with improved psychomotor skills, particularly when feedback was immediate, and training incorporated structured task progression. Task design varied, with only two studies tailoring training based on pre-existing skill levels. Stepwise task progression was reported in five studies. Feedback was delivered through either human mentors or automated simulator feedback, with mixed findings on their comparative effectiveness. While automated feedback ensured immediacy, human supervision was often deemed superior in guiding skill acquisition. Repetition was widely integrated, though session duration and spacing varied across studies. Learner motivation was explicitly assessed in one study, while two others incorporated motivation-enhancing interventions such as gamification and mentoring. DP-informed SBST resulted in improved accuracy, speed, confidence, and objective skill ratings. Some control groups also demonstrated skill improvements, though typically reaching performance plateaus earlier and at lower competency levels. Variability in DP adherence across studies influenced outcomes, with the most structured programs yielding the greatest benefits.

Conclusions: DP-informed SBST is a promising approach for developing MIS skills. Adherence to DP principles significantly enhances skill acquisition but limited by resource requirements. Future research should focus on optimizing DP integration within SBST to maximize its impact on surgical education.

Keywords: Deliberate practice; Minimally invasive surgery; Simulation; Surgical training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The need for ethics approval for systematic reviews has been waived off by the authors’ institution (Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka). Ethics approval and consent to participate. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram. From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6[7]: e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. For more information, visitwww.prisma-statement.org
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Aghazadeh F, Fathian R, Zheng B, Tavakoli M, Rouhani H. Experts employ a target-locking behaviour in laparoscopic surgery. 2022.
    1. Stassen HG, Dankelman J, Grimbergen KA, Meijer DW. Man-machine aspects of minimally invasive surgery. Annu Rev Control. 2001;25:111–22.
    1. Bond WF, Lammers RL, Spillane LL, Smith-Coggins R, Fernandez R, Reznek MA, et al. The use of simulation in emergency medicine: a research agenda. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(4):353–63. - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Petersen LA, Studdert DM. Medical errors involving trainees. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(19): 2030. - PubMed
    1. Franzese CB, Stringer SP. The evolution of surgical training: perspectives on educational models from the past to the future. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40(6):1227–35. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources