Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70218.
doi: 10.1002/pon.70218.

From Burden to Empowerment. Patient-Reported Influencing Factors on Participation in Shared Decision Making in Oncology, a Meta-Study

L Mertens  1 , H Wildiers  2 , H Van Veenendaal  3 , R Oueslati  4 , T Kasmi  1 , G Bekkering  1   5 , K Hannes  5   6 , N Delvaux  7 , M Vermandere  1 , P Van Bostraeten  1 , J Jaeken  1 , B Aertgeerts  1   5
Affiliations
Review

From Burden to Empowerment. Patient-Reported Influencing Factors on Participation in Shared Decision Making in Oncology, a Meta-Study

L Mertens et al. Psychooncology. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: We aim to provide a literature overview on patient-reported barriers and facilitators to participation in Shared Decision Making (SDM) within the setting of oncology.

Methodology: Within the set of selected studies for a larger qualitative meta-summary, using five databases, we selected the studies that had surveyed patients with oncologic illness for further analysis in this paper. Search terms were based on the concepts: 'decision making', 'patient participation', 'patient perceptions' and 'study design' aimed at eliciting patients' perspective, including patient surveys, interviews and focus groups.

Results: Out of the 90 studies that had been selected for the larger review, we selected 22 articles concerning oncologic illness for more detailed analysis in this review. In total, we identified 33 different barriers and facilitators. Based on the most frequently reported barriers and facilitators, we defined six broad analytical themes, reflecting patients' most frequently recurring challenges (Themes 1 and 2) and needs (Themes 3-6) in this setting: (1) 'High burdens', (2) 'Low self-efficacy to participate', (3) 'Clear information provision', (4) 'Social support', (5) 'Physicians' support', (6) 'Education, preparation and assertiveness'.

Conclusion: The high decisional and emotional burdens oncologic patients experience appear to be specific challenges to SDM in oncology, which often undermine patients' self-efficacy to participate and complicate patients' engagement in SDM. However, when offered the right support, patients may overcome the existing burdens and become more empowered to engage in SDM.

Practice implications: These insights need to be integrated in SDM strategies so that they may serve the ethical imperative of greater equality and the inclusion of diverse patient groups in different SDM settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of screening and selection process.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Infographic of analytical themes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Crossing the Quality Chasm . A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (National Academies Press (US), 2001). - PubMed
    1. Koh H. K., Brach C., Harris L. M., and Parchman M. L., “A Proposed ‘Health Literate Care Model’ Would Constitute a Systems Approach to Improving Patients’ Engagement in Care,” Health Affairs 32, no. 2 (2013): 357–367, 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry M. J. and Edgman‐Levitan S., “Shared Decision Making—the Pinnacle of Patient‐Centered Care,” New England Journal of Medicine 366, no. 9 (2012): 780–781, 10.1056/nejmp1109283. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G., Tilburt J. M. V., and Montori V., “The Ethical Imperative for Shared Decision‐Making,” European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare 1 (2013): 129–131, 10.5750/ejpch.v1i1.645. - DOI
    1. Stiggelbout A. M., Weijden T. V., Wit M. P. T. D., et al., “Shared Decision Making: Really Putting Patients at the Centre of Healthcare,” BMJ 344, (January 2012): e256, 10.1136/bmj.e256. - DOI - PubMed