Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 30:7:1588183.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1588183. eCollection 2025.

Self-monitoring of health - user viewpoints on gathering data using consumer health technologies during leisure time

Affiliations

Self-monitoring of health - user viewpoints on gathering data using consumer health technologies during leisure time

Nora Weinberger et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Consumer Health Technologies (CHTs), including wearables and brain-activity monitoring devices, are increasingly integrated into everyday life, extending beyond clinical settings into leisure activities. Yet, their ethical and social implications, especially in unregulated, non-clinical contexts, remain underexplored.

Methods: This qualitative study examines how individuals perceive and engage with CHTs by combining guided interviews and pre-interview questionnaires. It focuses on attitudes toward health data collection, data sharing, privacy concerns, and the use of EEG-supported devices.

Results: Findings reveal a complex landscape of trust and concern. While participants generally favored sharing data with research institutions over corporations or insurers, they were skeptical about broad consent models. Some acknowledged potential health benefits of CHTs and EEG-supported technologies, but also expressed concerns about data security, behavioral pressure, and the normalization of self-optimization.

Discussion: The results underscore the need to center user perspectives in the development of CHTs, to promote transparent and context-sensitive privacy policies, and to anticipate ethical implications. In particular, the article argues for ethical frameworks to guide the use of EEG-supported technologies in everyday settings, ensuring alignment with societal values and equitable access to digital health benefits.

Keywords: brain-activity monitoring devices; consumer health technologies; digital health; technology assessment; technology ethics; user perspectives; wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Evers-Wölk M, Oertel B, Sonk M, Jacobs M. Gesundheits-Apps: Eine Innovationsstudie des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung. TAB-Arbeitsbericht Nr. 179. Berlin: Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB) (2018). p. 160.
    1. Meidert U, Scheermesser M, Prieur Y, Hegyi S, Stockinger K, Eyyi G, et al. Quantified Self - Schnittstelle zwischen Lifestyle und Medizin. TA-Swiss-Studie. Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG; (2018).
    1. Greshake Tzovaras B, Angrist M, Arvai K, Dulaney M, Estrada-Galiñanes V, Gunderson B, et al. Open humans: a platform for participant-centered research and personal data exploration. GigaScience. (2019) 8(6):1–13. 10.1093/gigascience/giz076 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pantzar M, Ruckenstein M. Living the metrics: self-tracking and situated objectivity. Digit Health. (2017) 3:2055207617712590. 10.1177/2055207617712590 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt L, Pawlitzki M, Renard BY, Meuth SG, Masanneck L. The three-year evolution of Germany’s digital therapeutics reimbursement program and its path forward. NPJ Digit Med. (2024) 7(1):139. 10.1038/s41746-024-01137-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources