Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 15;135(14):e191944.
doi: 10.1172/JCI191944.

Evolving concepts in adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreas cancer

Affiliations
Review

Evolving concepts in adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreas cancer

John M Bryant et al. J Clin Invest. .

Abstract

Despite advances in multidisciplinary oncology care, curing patients diagnosed with pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains all too uncommon. In this Review, we discuss evolving concepts to guide the care of patients with operable PDAC, focusing on adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic therapies, the ever-controversial topic of radiation therapy, and the emerging role of cancer vaccines. Given the promise of biomarkers to better predict therapeutic response, the development of KRAS inhibitors, our ability to deliver higher doses of radiation therapy more precisely and safely, and the technology to rapidly produce highly personalized cancer vaccines, there is reason to expect that the guidelines for the care of our patients with operable PDAC will change rapidly in the next few years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mechanism of vaccine-induced cancer-specific immune response.
The adjuvant or minimal residual disease setting represents an attractive approach for vaccine therapy in PDAC. Advantages include avoiding significantly higher tumor burden and its associated immunosuppression in the advanced/metastatic setting as well as optimizing the ratio of effector T cells to tumor cells.

Similar articles

References

    1. Conroy T, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–1825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neoptolemos JP, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10073):1011–1024. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32409-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tempero MA, et al. Adjuvant nab-Paclitaxel + gemcitabine in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results from a randomized, open-label, phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(11):2007–2019. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01134. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oettle H, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1473–1481. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.279201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neoptolemos JP, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9293):1576–1585. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06651-X. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances