Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Aug;22(4):e70059.
doi: 10.1111/wvn.70059.

Chatbot-Delivered Interventions for Improving Mental Health Among Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Chatbot-Delivered Interventions for Improving Mental Health Among Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jiaying Li et al. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The characteristics, application, and effectiveness of chatbots in improving the mental health of young people have yet to be confirmed through systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of chatbot-delivered interventions for improving mental health among young people, identify factors influencing effectiveness, and examine feasibility and acceptability.

Methods: To identify eligible interventional studies, we systematically searched 11 databases and search engines covering a publication period of January 2014 to September 2024. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed on randomized controlled trials to investigate the effectiveness of chatbot-delivered interventions and potential influencing factors. Narrative syntheses were conducted to summarize the feasibility and acceptability of these interventions in all the included studies.

Results: We identified 29 eligible interventional studies, 13 of which were randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis indicated that chatbot-delivered interventions significantly reduced distress (Hedge's g = -0.28, 95% CI [-0.46, -0.10]), but did not have a significant effect on psychological well-being (Hedge's g = 0.13, 95% CI [-0.16, 0.41]). The observed treatment effects were influenced by factors including sample type, delivery platform, interaction mode, and response generation approach. Overall, this review demonstrates that chatbot-delivered interventions were feasible and acceptable.

Linking evidence to action: This review demonstrated that chatbot-delivered interventions had positive effects on psychological distress among young people. Chatbot-delivered interventions have the potential to supplement existing mental health services provided by multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. Future recommendations include using instant messenger platforms for delivery, enhancing chatbots with multiple communication methods to improve interaction quality, and refining language processing, accuracy, privacy, and security measures.

Keywords: chatbot; conversational agent; mental health; psychological distress; psychological well‐being; young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effects of chatbot‐delivered interventions on psychological distress. *Negative effect sizes indicate a more favorable outcome for the intervention group.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Effects of chatbot‐delivered interventions on psychological well‐being. *Positive effect sizes indicate a more favorable outcome for the intervention group.

References

    1. Abd‐Alrazaq, A. A. , Alajlani M., Alalwan A. A., Bewick B. M., Gardner P., and Househ M.. 2019. “An Overview of the Features of Chatbots in Mental Health: A Scoping Review.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 132: 103978. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103978. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abd‐Alrazaq, A. A. , Rababeh A., Alajlani M., Bewick B. M., and Househ M.. 2020. “Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, no. 7: e16021. 10.2196/16021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguirre Velasco, A. , Cruz I. S. S., Billings J., Jimenez M., and Rowe S.. 2020. “What Are the Barriers, Facilitators and Interventions Targeting Help‐Seeking Behaviours for Common Mental Health Problems in Adolescents? A Systematic Review.” BMC Psychiatry 20, no. 1: 293. 10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assink, M. , and Wibbelink C.. 2016. “Fitting Three‐Level Meta‐Analytic Models in R: A Step‐By‐Step Tutorial.” Quantitative Methods for Psychology 12: 154–174. 10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154. - DOI
    1. Balan, R. , Dobrean A., and Poetar C. R.. 2024. “Use of Automated Conversational Agents in Improving Young Population Mental Health: A Scoping Review.” npj Digital Medicine 7, no. 1: 75. 10.1038/s41746-024-01072-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed