Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;34(1):2533456.
doi: 10.1080/08037051.2025.2533456. Epub 2025 Jul 22.

Evaluation of race-free eGFR equations in individuals of different ethnicity

Affiliations

Evaluation of race-free eGFR equations in individuals of different ethnicity

De-Wei An et al. Blood Press. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from serum creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys), or both (eGFRcr-cys) by race-free equations are recommended staging chronic kidney disease (CKD). The current study aimed to compare these race-free eGFR equations for screening for low-grade CKD in Blacks and non-Blacks and to evaluate their association with mortality.

Methods: Race-free eGFR equations were evaluated in four studies with specific inclusion criteria based on the original research goals: African-PREDICT (341/380 healthy Black/White South Africans), FLEMENGHO (709 White community-dwelling Flemish), NHANES (1760/7931 Black and non-Black adult Americans), and 401 Black African patients hospitalised in Mbuji Mayi, Democratic Republic of Congo. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman statistics were used to assess consistency between eGFR equations and multivariable logistic or Cox regression to evaluate their association with mortality.

Results: Intraindividual discordance between eGFRs was larger in Black than non-Black NHANES and African-PREDICT participants. In NHANES, eGFRcr-cys was greater than eGFRcr, but smaller than eGFRcys, and replacing eGFRcr-cys by eGFRcr moved 25% Blacks and 15% non-Blacks to a higher (worse) eGFR KDIGO stage. In African-PREDICT and FLEMENGO, half of the measured creatinine clearance to eGFR ratios fell outside the expected 1.1-1.2 band. In NHANES, multivariable hazard ratios for total and cardiovascular mortality in relation to CKD grade were all lower than unity for grade-1 CKD and greater than unity for grade ≥3 (p < 0.0001) without any racial difference (0.11≤p ≤ 0.98). These NHANES findings were consistent, if CKD stage was replaced by eGFR and in subgroup analyses. Whereas eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys refined models, eGFRcr did not.

Conclusions: The NHANES mortality outcomes support the use of eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys. However, large intraindividual variability between eGFR estimates may lead to KDIGO eGFR stage misclassification and calls for caution in the opportunistic or systematic screening for CKD in asymptomatic individuals with prevention as objective.

Keywords: Biomedical analytics; chronic kidney disease; estimated glomerular filtration rate; mortality; population science; race.

Plain language summary

Glomerular filtration rate reflects the ability to remove excess water and waste by the kidney and can be estimated from serum creatinine (eGFR). However, serum creatinine is affected by muscle mass, dietary habits and other factors that cluster by race and lead to overestimation of eGFR and underestimation of the risk of kidney disease in Black individuals. Serum cystatin C is less affected by these confounders. Equations to compute eGFR from serum cystatin C or both serum creatinine and cystatin C without considering race are currently recommended. This study evaluated these race-free equations to compute eGFR in multi-ethnic study populations recruited in South Africa, Belgium, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the United States. The new methods produce eGFR estimates, which predict mortality and have near perfect reproducibility in the population as a whole. However, this study also identified large intraindividual differences between eGFR estimates that may lead to misclassification of patients with regard to their renal function. These observations call for caution in the clinical application of equations to derive eGFR from serum markers and highlight the need for further research to optimise the prevention and management of chronic kidney disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HM is the founder and co-owner of Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany. JS and AL are employees of Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH. None of the other authors declares a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart showing the selection of study participants. The mClcr/eGFR ratio was assessed in Black and White South Africans and in White Europeans, enrolled in African-PREDICT and FLEMENGHO, respectively (a). The association between mortality and eGFR derived from race-free equations was studied in Black and non-Black NHANES participants representative of the adult population of the United States and in Black hypertensive patients admitted to the emergency department of two hospitals in Mbuji Mayi, Democratic Republic of Congo (b). mClcr: measured creatinine clearance; HT: hypertension; BP: blood pressure; BMI: body mass index.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Ratio of measured creatinine clearance to eGFR derived by the CKD-EPI 2021 and EKFC 2023 equations. The equations to compute eGFR are given for CKD-EPI 2021 and EKFC 2023 in the Supplementary Tables 1–2. The mClcr/eGFR ratios for creatinine-based eGFRs are depicted in (a), for cystatin C-based eGFRs in (b), and for equations including both serum biomarkers in (c). The shaded area in the three panels reflects GFR uncorrected for the proximal tubular creatinine secretion, resulting in a mClcr/eGFR ratio ranging from 1.1 to 1.2. mClcr is standardised to 1.73 m2 body surface area. Plotted values are means ± 95% confidence interval. For ratios falling outside the band, the mean is given alongside the plotted value. For the same eGFR equation, none of the racial differences attained statistical significance (p ≥ 0.10).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Reclassification of chronic kidney disease grades in NHANES. Numbers in green, orange and red bars are percentages of chronic kidney disease grades (CKD) according to the 2024 KDIGO classification based on eGFR (≥90, 60–89, and <60 mL/min/1.73m2) from serum creatinine (eGFRcr), serum cystatin C (eGFRcys) or both (eGFRcr-cys). Non-Blacks include 2656 Hispanics and 5275 Whites. CKD-EPI denotes Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and EKFC the European Kidney Function Consortium. The κ statistic, given with 95% confidence interval, is a measure of the consistency in the distribution of CKD grades between adjacent classifications. κ values of >0.40, >0.60 and >0.80 indicate moderate, substantial and almost perfect agreement.

References

    1. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group . KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Intern. 2024;105:S117–S314. - PubMed
    1. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. ; for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group . A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461–470. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. ; for the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) . A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laster M, Shen JI, Norris KC.. Kidney disease among African-American: a population perspective. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72(5 Suppl 1):S3–S7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.06.021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed