Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 14.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011665. Online ahead of print.

The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Sense of Smell: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Cigarettes

Affiliations

The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Sense of Smell: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Cigarettes

Ahmet Koder et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use on olfactory function and compare the outcomes with traditional cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.

Methods: Participants were equally divided into 3 main groups (n=40 each): electronic cigarette users, traditional cigarette smokers, and nonsmokers. Among the e-cigarette users, 33 used liquid-based products and 7 used heated tobacco products. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test, which measures odor threshold, discrimination, and identification scores. The combined threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score was used to quantify overall olfactory performance. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests.

Results: Traditional smokers exhibited the lowest olfactory performance, with significantly reduced TDI, threshold, and identification scores compared with both e-cigarette users and nonsmokers ( P <0.05). E-cigarette users demonstrated significantly better olfactory scores than traditional smokers but poorer performance than nonsmokers, although the difference between e-cigarette users and nonsmokers was not statistically significant ( P =0.100). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of odor discrimination scores. E-cigarette use was associated with less severe olfactory impairment than traditional smoking, but still showed a trend toward reduced function compared with nonsmokers.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while e-cigarettes may be less detrimental to olfaction than traditional cigarettes, they are not without risk. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on the olfactory system.

Keywords: Electronic cigarette; Sniffin’ Sticks test; TDI score; olfactory function; traditional smoking; vaping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Chung S, Baumlin N, Dennis JS, et al. Electronic cigarette vapor with nicotine causes airway mucociliary dysfunction preferentially via TRPA1 receptors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:1134.
    1. Pagliuca G, Rosato C, Martellucci S, et al. Cytologic and functional alterations of nasal mucosa in smokers. Otolaryngol 2015;152:740.
    1. Antoniewicz L, Brynedal A, Hedman L, et al. Acute effects of electronic cigarette inhalation on the vasculature and the conducting airways. Cardiovasc Toxicol 2019;19:441.
    1. Litt MD, Duffy V, Oncken C. Cigarette smoking and electronic cigarette vaping patterns as a function of e-cigarette flavourings. Tob Control 2016;25(suppl 2):ii67-ii72
    1. Farsalinos KE, Voudris V. E-cigarette use and indoor air quality: methodological limitations. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2014;217:705.

LinkOut - more resources