A question of rate? Girl-women differences in motor unit firing rate
- PMID: 40663143
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-025-05899-8
A question of rate? Girl-women differences in motor unit firing rate
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate age-related differences in motor unit (MU) activation patterns in females during submaximal knee extensions.
Methods: Fourteen young women (22.1 ± 1.5 yrs) and 10 girls (9.8 ± 0.8 yrs) participated in the study. Following the determination of maximal strength (MVC), participants completed trapezoidal isometric contractions to 70%MVC and sEMG was recorded from the vastus lateralis. sEMG signals were decomposed, and MU firing rate (MUFR) and recruitment threshold (RT) were calculated. Group differences in MU activation patterns were assessed using multilevel modelling.
Results: Girls' MVC was significantly lower than young women's, even after accounting for body size (2.0 ± 0.4 and 2.6 ± 0.8 Nm/body mass, respectively). The y-intercept of the MUFR-RT relationship was significantly lower in girls compared with the young women (estimate = 4.38pps; p < 0.05). There were no group differences in the MUFR-RT slope, reflecting lower MUFR in girls among low and high-threshold MUs. Lastly, the highest RT at which MUs were identified was significantly (p = 0.04) lower in girls (53.4 ± 7.2%MVC) compared with young women (60.5 ± 8.2%MVC). Overall, girls had lower MUFR and recruited their MUs over a smaller range of RTs compared with women.
Conclusions: Together, these results suggest that girls and young women utilize different MU activation schemes when performing high-intensity knee extensions. Specifically, compared with women, girls may have to recruit more MUs over a narrower recruitment range due to their lower MUFRs.
Keywords: Children; Females; Maturation; Muscle performance; Neuromuscular.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration. Conflicts of interest: All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Asmussen E, Heebøll-Nielsen K (1955) A dimensional analysis of physical performance and growth in boys. J Appl Physiol 7:593–603. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1955.7.6.593 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blimkie CJ (1989) Age-and sex-associated variation in strength during childhood: anthropometric, morphologic, neurologic, biomechanical, endocrinologic, genetic, and physical activity correlates. Perspect Exerc Sci Sports Med 2:99–163
-
- Caviness V, Kennedy D, Richelme C et al (1996) The human brain age 7–11 years: a volumetric analysis based on magnetic resonance images. Cereb Cortex N Y N 6:726–736
-
- Chalchat E, Piponnier E, Bontemps B et al (2019) Characteristics of motor unit recruitment in boys and men at maximal and submaximal force levels. Exp Brain Res 237:1289–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05508-z - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
