Expert consensus‑based clinical practice guidelines for nutritional support in the intensive care unit: the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) and the French-Speaking Group of Pediatric Emergency Physicians and Intensivists (GFRUP)
- PMID: 40665004
- PMCID: PMC12263543
- DOI: 10.1186/s13613-025-01509-0
Expert consensus‑based clinical practice guidelines for nutritional support in the intensive care unit: the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) and the French-Speaking Group of Pediatric Emergency Physicians and Intensivists (GFRUP)
Abstract
The objective of this work was to develop guidelines for nutritional support in critically ill adults and children (excluding neonates and burn patients) unable to maintain an adequate oral intake. We aimed to provide up-to-date recommendations based on high-level evidence including the results of recent landmark randomized controlled trials. Experts from the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF), the French Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (SFNCM), and the French-Speaking Group of Pediatric Emergency Physicians and Intensivists (GFRUP) used the GRADE methodology to develop the guidelines. Twenty-four Patient Intervention Comparator Outcome (PICO) questions were identified, resulting in 34 adult and 29 pediatric recommendations. Of the 34 recommendations for adults, three were based on high-level evidence, 12 on moderate-level evidence, and 19 on expert opinion. The corresponding numbers for the 29 pediatric recommendations were one, five, and 23. All recommendations achieved strong agreement among the experts. These guidelines emphasize the importance of individualized nutritional support strategies that incorporate recent high-quality evidence to optimize the outcomes of critically ill patients.
Keywords: Adults; Calories; Children; Critical illness; Enteral nutrition; Nutritional support; Parenteral nutrition; Proteins; Recommendations.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: JR: funding from research programs run by the French Ministry of Health (NUTRIREA-2, NUTRIREA-3 and NUTRIREA-4 trials). BGLR: consulting fees from Fresenius. PFD: funding from research programs run by the French Ministry of Health, equipment loans from Aerogen and Fisher and Paykel, consulting fees from Aridis Pharmaceuticals. EF: consulting and training services fees from Baxter, Nutricia, Fresenius, Aguettant and BBraun. RT: consulting fees from Baxter, Fresenius-Kabi and Nutricia; writing reports or patient tools for Aguettant, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; speaker at symposia or scientific meetings organized by Astra-Zeneca, Baxter, BBraun, Fresenius-Kabi, Lactalis, Nestlé, Novonordisk, Nutricia, or Shire; fees for the design of the SEFI® (KNoë-Groupe Get, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France). FV: consulting fees from Baxter, Nutricia and Nestle Health Science. TV: consulting and training fees from Baxter and Nutricia; travel expense for congress: Nestlé, Sysmed and Homeperf. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, Chan P, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013;310:1591. - PubMed
-
- Herridge MS, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Mehta S, Slutsky AS. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(3):275–6. - PubMed
-
- Herridge MS, Azoulay É. Outcomes after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:913–24. - PubMed
-
- Reignier J, Rice TW, Arabi YM, Casaer M. Nutritional support in the ICU. BMJ. 2025;388: e077979. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
