Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;44(9):3391-3398.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07545-2. Epub 2025 Jul 15.

Leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) decrement during biologics therapy and its correlation with disease features and treatment outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Affiliations

Leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) decrement during biologics therapy and its correlation with disease features and treatment outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Liang Zou et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) was previously reported to regulate inflammation and arthritis progression. This study aimed to investigate the correlation of serum LRG1 level with disease features and response to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods: Seventy-eight RA patients who underwent biologics treatment were analyzed. Serum LRG1 level was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline (before biologics were initiated) and at weeks 6 and 12. Treatment response, low disease activity (LDA), and remission were analyzed on the basis of disease activity score in 28 joints. Moreover, serum LRG1 level in another 20 health controls was also analyzed.

Results: LRG1 was greater in RA patients than in health controls (46.3 versus 28.6 µg/mL, P < 0.001), with an area under the curve of 0.795 for differentiating them according to the receiver operator characteristic curve. By correlation analysis, LRG1 was correlated with a greater body mass index (P = 0.007) and C-reactive protein level (P = 0.013) in RA patients and tended to be associated with swollen joint count but was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). Furthermore, LRG1 decreased from baseline to week 12 after biologics treatment in RA patients (P < 0.001). However, baseline LRG1 was not correlated with treatment response (P = 0.987), LDA (P = 0.405), or remission (P = 0.763) in RA patients. A decrease in LRG1 at week 12 (P = 0.028) was related to response achievement, and a decrease in LRG1 at week 6 (P = 0.047) and week 12 (P = 0.019) was related to LDA achievement.

Conclusion: LRG1 may aid in RA disease supervision, but further validation is needed. Key Points • LRG1 level can distinguish RA patients from health controls with a high AUC at 0.795. • LRG1 level is correlated with higher BMI and CRP level, and tends to be related to elevated SJC in RA patients. • LRG1 level after treatment is correlated with clinical response and LDA to biologics in RA patients, while its level before treatment fails to do so. • Collectively, LRG1 level shows a potential to be a biomarker for RA disease supervision.

Keywords: Disease activity; Health controls; Response to biologics; Rheumatoid arthritis; Serum LRG1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: All procedures have been approved by the ethics committee of Wuhan No.1 Hospital and performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent: All participants signed the informed consent. Disclosures: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dysregulated LRG1 level. Comparison of LRG1 level between RA patients and health controls (A). ROC curve analysis of LRG1 level for distinguishing RA patients from health controls (B). Diagnostic indexes of LRG1 level by different cutoffs for RA (C)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Treatment outcomes at different timepoints. DAS28ESR score at baseline, week 6, and week 12 (A). Response rate at baseline, week 6, and week 12 (B). LDA rate at baseline, week 6, and week 12 (C). Remission rate at baseline, week 6, and week 12 (D)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
LRG1 decrement related to treatment outcome to some extent. LRG1 level at baseline, week 6, and week 12 (A). Comparison of LRG1 level at baseline, week 6, and week 12, between response RA patients and no response RA patients (B), between LDA RA patients and no LDA RA patients (C), between remission RA patients and no remission RA patients (D)

Similar articles

References

    1. Di Matteo A, Bathon JM, Emery P (2023) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 402(10416):2019–2033. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01525-8 - PubMed
    1. Almutairi K, Nossent J, Preen D, Keen H, Inderjeeth C (2021) The global prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis based on a systematic review. Rheumatol Int 41(5):863–877. 10.1007/s00296-020-04731-0 - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bergstra SA, Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Aletaha D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Hyrich KL, Pope JE, de Souza S, Stamm TA, Takeuchi T, Verschueren P, Winthrop KL, Balsa A, Bathon JM, Buch MH, Burmester GR, Buttgereit F, Cardiel MH, Chatzidionysiou K, Codreanu C, Cutolo M, den Broeder AA, El Aoufy K, Finckh A, Fonseca JE, Gottenberg JE, Haavardsholm EA, Iagnocco A, Lauper K, Li Z, McInnes IB, Mysler EF, Nash P, Poor G, Ristic GG, Rivellese F, Rubbert-Roth A, Schulze-Koops H, Stoilov N, Strangfeld A, van der Helm-van Mil A, van Duuren E, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Westhovens R, van der Heijde D (2023) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 82(1):3–18. 10.1136/ard-2022-223356 - PubMed
    1. Patel JP, Konanur Srinivasa NK, Gande A, Anusha M, Dar H, Baji DB (2023) The role of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review. Cureus 15(1):e33293. 10.7759/cureus.33293 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao JH, Ma S, Li CY, Zhang HC, Zhao LJ, Zhang ZY (2023) Clinically approved small-molecule drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Med Chem 256:115434. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115434 - PubMed