Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jul 15;26(1):388.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04297-8.

Policy strategies to enhance uptake of conservative kidney management in advanced chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Natasha Chawla  1 , Yot Teerawattananon  2 , Natcha Yongphiphatwong  3 , Natanong Thamcharoen  4 , Henny Aryani  2 , Yin May Tun  2 , Dimple Haresh Butani  2 , Rujira Ngam-Prukwanit  5 , Thunyarat Anothaisintawee  6   7
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Policy strategies to enhance uptake of conservative kidney management in advanced chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Natasha Chawla et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background: Conservative kidney management (CKM) is an established treatment option for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease(CKD) who are not candidates for kidney replacement therapy(KRT). Despite its benefits, CKM uptake remains low. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of policy strategies designed to promote CKM uptake in advanced CKD patients.

Methods: Relevant studies were identified through searches of Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases since 2000 through 24 July 2024. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of interventions aiming to increase CKM utilization or preference in patients with chronic kidney disease were eligible for this study. Pairwise meta-analysis using the inverse variance or DerSimonion and Laird method, was applied to estimate the efficacy of interventions across studies.

Results: Seven studies were included in this systematic review. Education and training interventions which provided knowledge about CKM to patients and their families, did not significantly increased preference for CKM among CKD patients, compared to no intervention with a pooled OR of 1.05 (95% CI: 0.62-1.76; I2 = 0%). In contrast, results of two included studies found that strategies focused on reforming healthcare services, particularly through assessing patient prognosis and communicating results to nephrologists to inform decisions on KRT, significantly increased CKM utilization in patients with advanced CKD.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that educating patients and their families about CKM did not result in a statistically significant increase in CKM preference compared to no intervention. In contrast, interventions aimed at reforming healthcare services by implementing prognostication assessments into clinical practice might significantly increase CKM utilization. However, these conclusions are based on a limited number of observational studies, highlighting the need for further research to validate the effectiveness of these interventions.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Conservative kidney management; Meta-analysis; Policy intervention; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta-analysis of education and training interventions on preference for conservative kidney management among CKD patients
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Berger JR, Jaikaransingh V, Hedayati SS. End-stage kidney disease in the elderly: Approach to dialysis initiation, choosing modality, and predicting outcomes. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016;23(1):36–43. - PubMed
    1. Bradbury BD, Fissell RB, Albert JM, Anthony MS, Critchlow CW, Pisoni RL, Port FK, Gillespie BW. Predictors of early mortality among incident US hemodialysis patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns study (DOPPS). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(1):89–99. - PubMed
    1. Tanaka M, Ishibashi Y, Hamasaki Y, Kamijo Y, Idei M, Kawahara T, Nishi T, Takeda M, Nonaka H, Nangaku M, et al. Health-related quality of life on combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in comparison with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: A cross-sectional study. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(5):462–69. - PubMed
    1. Santos PR, Capote Junior J, Cavalcante Filho JRM, Ferreira TP, Dos Santos Filho JNG, da Silva Oliveira S. Religious coping methods predict depression and quality of life among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lanini I, Samoni S, Husain-Syed F, Fabbri S, Canzani F, Messeri A, Mediati RD, Ricci Z, Romagnoli S, Villa G. Palliative care for patients with kidney disease. J Clin Med. 2022;11(13). - PMC - PubMed