Assessing repeatability and confounding factors of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for quantitative liver imaging
- PMID: 40665614
- DOI: 10.1002/mp.17932
Assessing repeatability and confounding factors of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for quantitative liver imaging
Abstract
Background: Advanced radiation therapy techniques are increasingly used to treat liver cancers. However, the lack of robust imaging approaches for reliable assessment of early-phase treatment response limits full potential of these therapeutic methods.
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a new quantitative MR imaging technique, named magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), in terms of repeatability, reproducibility, and motion sensitivity for quantitative T1 and T2 assessment in hepatic tissues.
Methods: A rapid 2D liver MRF technique based on a steady-state free precession sequence was adapted and performed on 3T MR scanners. Quantitative T1 and T2 relaxation time maps with a spatial resolution of 1.6 mm and slice thickness of 5 mm were acquired simultaneously in one breath-hold of 15 s per imaging slice. The accuracy of the liver MRF method was first validated using the standardized water phantom. The repeatability and reproducibility of the liver MRF were further evaluated on five healthy volunteers. Each volunteer was scanned once per week for three consecutive weeks. The effects of dietary status and respiratory motion were further evaluated on three subjects. Finally, a pilot study was performed on one patient with multiple metastatic lesions.
Results: Phantom experiments show the liver MRF method achieved an accurate assessment for T1 up to 2000 ms and T2 up to 300 ms. High-quality quantitative T1 and T2 maps were successfully obtained from all five subjects. Bland-Altman plots show that both T1 and T2 obtained from MRF are highly repeatable, with a coefficient of repeatability of 86 ms for T1 and 9 ms for T2. The quantitative measurements are also highly reproducible with a coefficient of variation of 1.5% ± 0.2% for T1 (range, 1.3%-1.7%) and 4.1% ± 1.3% for T2 (range, 2.9%-5.5%). The MRF-derived T1 and T2 measurements are independent of dietary status. However, clear motion artifacts and vessel blurring were noted in motion-contaminated scan scenarios, which had instructions for 10 s initial breath-holding followed by 5 s shallow breathing. Finally, higher T1 and T2 values were observed in the metastatic lesions as compared to the values obtained in normal liver parenchyma.
Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that 2D liver MRF can provide high-quality, repeatable, and reproducible T1 and T2 mapping for hepatic tissues. These findings suggest potential applications in tissue/lesion characterization and longitudinal treatment response monitoring in the liver.
Keywords: dietary status; magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF); motion artifacts; radiation therapy; repeatability; reproducibility.
© 2025 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Multicenter Repeatability and Reproducibility of MR Fingerprinting in Phantoms and in Prostatic Tissue.Magn Reson Med. 2022 Oct;88(4):1818-1827. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29264. Epub 2022 Jun 17. Magn Reson Med. 2022. PMID: 35713379 Free PMC article.
-
Distortion-free steady-state diffusion-weighted imaging with magnetic resonance fingerprinting.Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17894. doi: 10.1002/mp.17894. Epub 2025 May 19. Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 40387505 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous Bilateral T1, T2, and T1ρ Relaxation Mapping of Hip Joint With 3D-MRI Fingerprinting.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jul;62(1):160-173. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29679. Epub 2024 Dec 24. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39718435
-
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29357120 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23611316 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A, Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17‐48.
-
- Horn SR, Stoltzfus KC, Lehrer EJ, et al. Epidemiology of liver metastases. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;67:101760.
-
- Kirichenko A, Gayou O, Parda D, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without surgery for primary and metastatic liver tumors. HPB. 2016;18(1):88‐97.
-
- Ibarra RA, Rojas D, Snyder L, et al. Multicenter results of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for non‐resectable primary liver tumors. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(5):575‐583.
-
- Scorsetti M, Comito T, Cozzi L, et al. The challenge of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): results of a single‐institutional experience on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(7):1301‐1309.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous