Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 11.
doi: 10.4143/crt.2025.276. Online ahead of print.

Comparative Effectiveness of Anbalcabtagene Autoleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Affiliations
Free article

Comparative Effectiveness of Anbalcabtagene Autoleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Hee-Jin Seo et al. Cancer Res Treat. .
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: Anbalcabtagene autoleucel (anbal-cel) is a second-generation CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy reducing T-cell exhaustion through PD-1 and TIGIT downregulation. We compared efficacy of anbal-cel with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using external control arm study design.

Materials and methods: We performed a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using individual patient data from CRC01-01 (NCT#04836507) and aggregate data from JULIET trial (NCT#02445248). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression free-survival (PFS), with corresponding hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) assessed using weighted Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR), with corresponding odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI assessed using weighted logistic regression model.

Results: We included 79 patients in CRC01-01 and 115 in JULIET trial. In naïve comparison, median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI 13.1-NE) for anbal-cel versus 11.1 months (6.6-23.9) for tisa-cel, corresponding to HR of 0.54 (0.34-0.87). Median PFS was 5.5 months (4.2-16.2) versus 2.9 months (2.3-5.2) with HR of 0.73 (0.50-1.08). ORR was 73.4% versus 53.0% with OR of 2.45 (1.32-4.54), and CRR was 64.6% versus 39.1% with OR of 2.83 (1.56-5.13). After applying MAIC to balance prognostic factors between the groups, adjusted HRs or ORs were 0.47 (0.23-0.95) for OS, 0.59 (0.36-0.96) for PFS, 2.60 (1.04-6.52) for ORR, and 3.00 (1.30-6.92) for CRR.

Conclusion: Anbal-cel showed superior effectiveness over tisa-cel, with higher response rates and improved survival outcomes, even after accounting for imbalances in prognostic factors at trial enrollment.

Keywords: Anbalcabtagene autoleucel; CAR T cell therapy; Indirect treatment comparison; Large B-cell lymphoma; Tisagenlecleucel.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources