Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 24;18(2):150-154.
doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_258_24. eCollection 2025 May-Aug.

Evaluation of corneal endothelial cell loss following vitrectomy with different endotamponades

Kirti Rani  1 , Anil Solanki  2 , Neha Agarwal  1 , Shashi Nath Jha  1 , Ritika Aggarwal  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of corneal endothelial cell loss following vitrectomy with different endotamponades

Kirti Rani et al. Oman J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Context: Ensuring functional corneal endothelium is imperative for achieving optimal surgical outcomes following successful vitreoretinal surgery. Despite the critical role of the corneal endothelium in postoperative recovery, limited research has addressed endothelial cell damage specifically attributed to vitreoretinal procedures. This knowledge gap necessitates further investigations to better understand the potential loss of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) associated with vitreoretinal surgery.

Aims: To evaluate the effect of vitreoretinal surgery on CECs by using different endotamponading agents.

Settings and design: Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative, and observational study.

Subjects and methods: Patients (n = 32) were divided into three groups: C3F8 gas (Group A), silicone oil (Group B), and Ringer Lactate (Group C). Corneal endothelial parameters including, the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), average cell area (AVG), coefficient of variation (CV), central corneal thickness (CCT), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) were assessed preoperatively, at 1 month, and 3 month postsurgery.

Statistical analysis used: SPSS software version 16.0, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Wilcoxon, and Chi-square tests were used. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Significant differences in the changes in ECD and CCT were observed between the groups (P > 0.05). However, AVG, CV and HEX were not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences in the changes in endothelial cell parameters were noted between phakic and pseudophakic eyes.

Conclusions: CEC damage following vitrectomy with different endotamponades is a crucial consideration in vitreoretinal surgery. Vitreoretinal surgeons must carefully weigh the benefits and risks associated with different tamponade agents to safeguard corneal health in vitreoretinal surgeries.

Keywords: Corneal endothelial cell; endotamponading agent; vitreoretinal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution of mean endothelial cell density for operated eyes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Choi JY, Han YK. Long-term (≥10 years) results of corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54:438–44. - PubMed
    1. Ibrahim SF, Zaki HA, Dabour SA, Eid AM. Corneal endothelial cell changes after pars plana vitrectomy silicone versus non silicone filled eyes. Zagazig Univ Med J. 2022;28:239–44.
    1. Yang CS, Chen KH, Hsu WM, Li YS. Cytotoxicity of silicone oil on cultivated human corneal endothelium. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:282–8. - PubMed
    1. Lucena DR, Ribeiro MS, Messias A, Bicas HE, Scott IU, Jorge R. Comparison of corneal changes after phacoemulsification using BSS plus versus lactated ringer's irrigating solution: A prospective randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:485–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenfeld SI, Waltman SR, Olk RJ, Gordon M. Comparison of intraocular irrigating solutions in pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:109–15. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources