Neurophysiological encoding of aversive prediction errors
- PMID: 40668023
- PMCID: PMC12270284
- DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003712
Neurophysiological encoding of aversive prediction errors
Abstract
Aversive prediction error (PE) brain signals generated by unexpected pain or pain absence are crucial for learning to avoid future pain. Yet, the detailed neurophysiological origins of PE signaling remain unclear. In this study, we combined an instrumental pain avoidance task with computational modeling and magnetoencephalography to detect time-resolved activations underlying pain expectations and aversive PE signals in the human brain. The task entailed learning probabilistically changing cue-pain associations to avoid receiving a pain stimulus. We used an axiomatic approach to identify general aversive PE signals that encode the degree to which the outcome deviated from expectations. Our findings indicate that aversive PE signals are generated in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) by the midbrain/diencephalon, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex approximately 150 milliseconds after outcome delivery. Moreover, alpha oscillations in these regions also encoded pain expectations before the outcome. We speculate that this may facilitate the rapid generation of PEs by allowing outcome-related nociceptive activity to be integrated with ongoing predictive signals. Finally, decisions to avoid pain recruited alpha oscillations in the anterior cingulate and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices, suggesting their active engagement in comparing predicted action values. Overall, our data reveal the rapid neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the generation of aversive PEs and subsequent decision-making.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04603417.
Keywords: Aversive prediction error; Brain oscillations; Magnetoencephalography; Pain-related learning.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest pertaining to the proposed research.
Similar articles
-
Short-Term Memory Impairment.2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 31424720 Free Books & Documents.
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
-
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 38517402
-
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34706066 Free PMC article.
-
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39046101 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arnal LH, Giraud AL. Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn Sci 2012;16(7):390–398. - PubMed
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical