Epidemiology of Human Metapneumovirus Infection in a Community Setting, Seattle, Washington, USA
- PMID: 40668104
- PMCID: PMC12265066
- DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf142
Epidemiology of Human Metapneumovirus Infection in a Community Setting, Seattle, Washington, USA
Abstract
Background: The clinical and genomic epidemiology of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infections in community settings is not well understood.
Methods: From 2018 to 2022, individuals with respiratory symptoms were recruited and enrolled from the greater Seattle, Washington community in the United States. Residual clinical specimens from individuals presenting with respiratory symptoms were additionally collected. Specimens were tested for hMPV by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, with whole genome sequencing performed on a subset (209/1002).
Results: hMPV positivity was higher among clinical specimens (835/21 539 [3.9%]) compared to community specimens (167/28 348 [0.6%]). Children aged 0-4 years had the highest percent positivity across both clinical and community settings (497/10 213 [4.9%] and 28/1640 [1.7%], respectively). In multivariate analysis, a household income of ≤US$100 000 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.72 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.07-2.85]), and recent international travel (aOR, 6.51 [95% CI, 3.11-12.22]) were associated with hMPV positivity. A subset of 209 of 1002 samples (21%) was sequenced; the distribution of subtypes A2b, A2c, B1, and B2 were similar across both community and clinical settings, with an increase in the proportion of subtype B1 after the start of the pandemic.
Conclusions: Risk factors of testing positive for hMPV in a community setting included lower household income and recent international travel. Co-circulation of hMPV subtypes was observed across community and clinical settings.
Keywords: clinical epidemiology; community setting; genomic epidemiology; geospatial percent positivity; human metapneumovirus.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflicts of interest. H. Y. C. has served on advisory boards for Roche, Vir, Merck, and AbbVie; has conducted continuing medical education teaching with Medscape, Vindico, and Clinical Care Options; has received research funding from the Gates Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; and currently serves on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices board. J. A. E. has served as a consultant with AbbVie, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Meissa, Pfizer, Shionogi, and Cidarra, outside of the submitted work; and has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Moderna, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. M. B. has served as a consultant with AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work, and has received research funding from AstraZeneca and Pulmotect. A. L. G. reports central laboratory contract testing from Abbott, Cepheid, Novavax, Pfizer, Janssen, and Hologic, and research support from Gilead, outside of the described work. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Figures
References
-
- van den Hoogen BG, Osterhaus DME, Fouchier RAM. Clinical impact and diagnosis of human metapneumovirus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23(1 Suppl):S25–32. - PubMed
-
- Falsey AR, Erdman D, Anderson LJ, Walsh EE. Human metapneumovirus infections in young and elderly adults. J Infect Dis 2003; 187:785–90. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
