Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul-Aug;55(7):388-394.
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001596.

Identifying Fraudulent Responses and Imposters in Research Recruitment of Subjects Through Social Media

Affiliations

Identifying Fraudulent Responses and Imposters in Research Recruitment of Subjects Through Social Media

Kashica J Webber-Ritchey et al. J Nurs Adm. 2025 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe strategies to manage bots and frauds (B/F) during online recruitment of research subjects.

Background: Bots mimic human responses in surveys using sophisticated algorithms. Fraudulent responses occur when false or misleading information is provided to gain research incentives. This research team identified substantial issues with fraudulent responses and imposters. This issue has not been well reported in the literature.

Methods: Nurse managers recruited through social media completed an online survey in a national nurse-led research study. A gift card stipend was offered to participants for survey completion. An unexpected surge in survey responses prompted researchers to halt recruitment. Multiple B/F mitigation and data validation strategies were implemented to ensure data integrity and are discussed in this article.

Results: Of the 836 surveys, only 152 (18.2%) were complete and valid.

Conclusions: When using social media for online research, incorporating preemptive mitigation strategies to combat B/F responses is essential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Timmins F. Surveys and questionnaires in nursing research. Nurs Stand . 2015;29(42):42–50. doi:10.7748/ns.29.42.42.e8904. - DOI
    1. Ali SH, Foreman J, Capasso A, Jones AM, Tozan Y, DiClemente RJ. Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol . 2020;20(1):116. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01011-0. - DOI
    1. Levi R, Ridberg R, Akers M, Seligman H. Survey fraud and the integrity of web-based survey research. Am J Health Promot . 2022;36(1):18–20. doi:10.1177/08901171211037531. - DOI
    1. Lawrence PR, Osborne MC, Sharma D, Spratling R, Calamaro CJ. Methodological challenge: addressing bots in online research. J Pediatr Health Care . 2023;37(3):328–332. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.12.006. - DOI
    1. Wang J, Calderon G, Hager ER, et al. Identifying and preventing fraudulent responses in online public health surveys: lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS Glob Public Health . 2023;3(8):e0001452. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001452. - DOI