Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 16.
doi: 10.1038/s41596-025-01195-z. Online ahead of print.

Developing chemical kinetic models for thermochemical applications

Affiliations
Review

Developing chemical kinetic models for thermochemical applications

Marco Mehl et al. Nat Protoc. .

Abstract

A general procedure for the development of chemical kinetic models relevant to thermochemical applications (pyrolysis, gasification and combustion) is described. Here we present techniques that aim at producing models that are modular in structure, thoroughly validated, and applicable to a wide variety of conditions (generality), while balancing accuracy and computational burden. Starting from a core mechanism describing the pyrolysis and oxidation of light species, heavier compounds are added to the model in a hierarchical fashion, starting from archetypal species of each class of compounds. Using analogy rules derived from the archetypal species, a list of reactions and reaction rate parameters are compiled for molecules belonging to the classes of interest, obtaining detailed or semidetailed reaction mechanisms. The model is then validated using data available from the literature and/or novel experiments performed ad hoc. Depending on the applications of interest and on the size of the model, a mechanism reduction can be performed using a combination of lumping techniques and flux or sensitivity analyses. These procedures, although partially automated, still require some level of expert knowledge. The development of reaction rate rules and the identification of reaction pathways require indeed critical analysis and are most effective when the operator has previous experience in the field. A rigorously built mechanism, obeying the general principles presented here, provides high predictivity and permits extrapolating fuel behavior with greater confidence outside the range of validation conditions compared with models assembled from nonconsistently sourced submechanism from the literature, or based on limited datasets and empirical information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Dixon-Lewis, G. Flame structure and flame reaction kinetics-V. Investigation of reaction mechanism in a rich hydrogen+nitrogen+oxygen flame by solution of conservation equations. Proc. R. Soc. London. A 317, 235–263 (1970).
    1. Kohse-Hinghaus, K. Combustion, chemistry, and carbon neutrality. Chem. Rev. 123, 5139–5219 (2023).
    1. Lu, T. & Law, C. K. Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 35, 192–215 (2009).
    1. Ranzi, E., Dente, M., Goldaniga, A., Bozzano, G. & Faravelli, T. Lumping procedures in detailed kinetic modeling of gasification, pyrolysis, partial oxidation and combustion of hydrocarbon mixtures. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 27, 99–139 (2001).
    1. Stagni, A., Frassoldati, A., Cuoci, A., Faravelli, T. & Ranzi, E. Skeletal mechanism reduction through species-targeted sensitivity analysis. Combust. Flame 163, 382–393 (2016).

LinkOut - more resources