Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 17.
doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01789-1. Online ahead of print.

Development of a laboratory-based frailty index for risk prediction in elderly trauma patients with hip fractures

Affiliations

Development of a laboratory-based frailty index for risk prediction in elderly trauma patients with hip fractures

Malou-Sophie Dietrich et al. Geroscience. .

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a laboratory-based frailty index (FI-Lab) to predict 12-month mortality risk in elderly patients following a hip fracture (HF). A retrospective analysis of 235 consecutive patients over 70 years old, who underwent HF surgery, was conducted. The FI-Lab, based on 21 routine blood parameters, was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristics, Area Under the Curve (AUC), Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional Hazard ratios. The FI-Lab showed an AUC of 0.7177 for 6-month and 0.7423 for 1-year survival. High FI-Lab values correlated with higher preoperative ASA scores, longer time-to-surgery times, more perioperative transfusions, and higher postoperative complication rates. The Cox hazard ratio revealed a significant increase in the risk of death for 1 year and 6 months from a score of 0.4 and higher. These findings highlight the FI-Lab's clinical relevance and validity as a predictive tool, emphasizing the need for differentiated perioperative risk stratification.

Keywords: Hip fracture; Laboratory-based frailty index; Predictive tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hoogendijk EO, et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019;394:1365–75. - PubMed
    1. Collard RM, et al. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1487–92. - PubMed
    1. Dent E, et al. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet. 2019;394:1376–86. - PubMed
    1. Topinková E. Aging, disability and frailty. Ann Nutr Metab. 2008;52(Suppl 1):6–11. - PubMed
    1. Morley JE, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14:392–7. - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources