Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):767.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07850-3.

Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a birth cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study

Affiliations

Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a birth cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study

Allison M Grech et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: “BABY1000” was a pilot prospective birth cohort study based in Sydney, Australia, which aimed to identify factors before and during pregnancy that impact child and long-term health and assess study feasibility and acceptability. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health orders affected study protocols. This sub-study aimed to explore feasibility and acceptability of BABY1000 within this context.

Methods: Recruitment of women commenced before conception or during early pregnancy attending clinics at a major hospital in Sydney. Data collection extended from recruitment, across pregnancy at 12-, 20-, 28- and 36-weeks’ gestation, and postnatally (in both mothers and children) until the child’s second birthday. Feasibility was assessed using routinely collected data on recruitment, retention, and completion. BABY1000 participants were invited to complete an online acceptability survey, including the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and to participate in focus group discussions. Paired t-tests were used to compare sub-study respondents to the wider cohort of participants to assess for demographic drivers of feasibility. Chi-squared tests were used to examine associations between high anxiety and demographic characteristics, study acceptability, and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on study participation.

Results: From 225 women recruited, 180 (80%) remained enrolled at the end of pregnancy, with 100 (44%) remaining in the study until 24-months. Participant retention and data completeness were most challenging after birth. Eighty-seven mothers completed the acceptability survey and 22 parents participated in focus groups. Most participants found the study protocol to be acceptable and comfortable. A “high” anxiety score was not associated with study acceptability or willingness to participate, although metrics of both feasibility and acceptability were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions: Whilst public health orders associated with the COVID-19 pandemic impacted feasibility and acceptability of the BABY1000 cohort, this sub-study found it is both feasible and acceptable to collect comprehensive biological, questionnaire, and health data from early pregnancy to two years. Study designs which tailor resources to where participant attrition can be predicted and have capacity to adapt to changing circumstances will be best placed to contribute to understanding of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-025-07850-3.

Keywords: Acceptability; COVID-19; Cohort studies; DOHaD; Feasibility; Pandemic; Pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The BABY1000 pilot obtained ethical approval from Sydney Local Health District (RPAH zone) Review Committee (protocol no. X170019) and all procedures were followed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This sub-study received additional ethics approval to include questions relating to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and FGDs. All parents who agreed to participate were provided an information sheet and were required to indicate that they had read it before providing written consent. Whilst there were no anticipated harms of participating, the information also signposted relevant support information and services if participants felt distressed by sharing their experiences. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
BABY1000 participant retention, study visit attendance and reasons for non-attendance. PC = Preconception; W = weeks; M = months; LTFU = lost to follow-up. The total number of study participants at 24 M (N = 100) was calculated by subtracting the sum of those who withdrew (N = 46), were LTFU (N = 70), or did not achieve pregnancy or had a pregnancy loss (N = 9) from the total number recruited (N = 225)

Similar articles

References

    1. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, et al. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):61–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffman DJ, Reynolds RM, Hardy DB. Developmental origins of health and disease: current knowledge and potential mechanisms. Nutr Rev. 2017;75(12):951–70. - PubMed
    1. Canova C, Cantarutti A. Population-based birth cohort studies in epidemiology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. 10.3390/ijerph17155276. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hagemann E, Silva DT, Davis JA, et al. Developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD): the importance of life-course and transgenerational approaches. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2021;40:3–9. - PubMed
    1. Oken E, Bastain TM, Bornkamp N et al. When a birth cohort grows up: challenges and opportunities in longitudinal developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) research. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2023;14(2):175–81. 10.1017/S2040174422000629. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources