Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):763.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07870-z.

The criteria to classify body-proportionality of the small for gestational age newborn: a scoping review

Affiliations

The criteria to classify body-proportionality of the small for gestational age newborn: a scoping review

Aziz Berkay Karadavut et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Purpose: To create an overview of the criteria used to classify small for gestational age (SGA) newborns according to their body-proportionality as either asymmetric SGA or symmetric SGA, and to create an overview of the clinical outcomes related to body-proportionality.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they described SGA newborns regardless of gestational age and if their classification on body-proportionality was given for both aSGA and sSGA. Data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers.

Results: Of the 38,265 studies identified after deduplication, 45 were included. Body-proportionality was classified by the ponderal index (PI) in 55.6% of studies (n = 25), head circumference (HC) in 24.4% (n = 11), birth length in 11.1% (n = 5), birth length and HC in 4.4% (n = 2), birth length and PI in 2.2% (n = 1), and PI, brain-to-body ratio and HC/length ratio in 2.2% (n = 1). The most commonly reported outcomes were asphyxia, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, mortality and respiratory distress syndrome. The results regarding the outcomes were inconsistent and contradictory.

Conclusion: Large heterogeneity in the published classifications and clinical outcomes regarding body-proportionality in the SGA newborns exists. Consensus on terms, methods and cut-off values used for body-proportionality is needed to improve future comparison of study results.

Keywords: Asymmetry; Birth weight; Disproportionate; Neonate; Small for gestational age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the selection process (conform PRISMA 2020)

References

    1. Vayssière C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, Bernard C, Cambourieu D, Flamant C, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French college of gynaecologists and obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:10–8. - PubMed
    1. Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71:159–63. - PubMed
    1. Beune IM, Bloomfield FH, Ganzevoort W, Embleton ND, Rozance PJ, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, et al. Consensus based definition of growth restriction in the newborn. J Pediatr. 2018;196:71-6.e1. - PubMed
    1. Hughes MM, Black RE, Katz J. 2500-g low birth weight cutoff: history and implications for future research and policy. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21:283–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landmann E, Reiss I, Misselwitz B, Gortner L. Ponderal index for discrimination between symmetric and asymmetric growth restriction: percentiles for neonates from 30 weeks to 43 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19:157–60. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources