Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):e86157.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.86157. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Efficacy of Non-opioid Analgesics in the Management of Postoperative Pain After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Review

Efficacy of Non-opioid Analgesics in the Management of Postoperative Pain After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Benny Ponappan et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Postoperative pain (POP) is one of the leading clinical challenges of patients undergoing major surgeries, including abdominal surgeries. Opioid analgesics are considered the gold standard for POP. However, their use is associated with a high incidence of adverse events, including nausea and vomiting, which has prompted clinicians to look for alternative regimens that are not opioid-based. This review aims to provide an overview of the existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-opioid analgesics (NOAs) in the management of POP in patients who have undergone major abdominal surgeries. A comprehensive search was conducted on four databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, CENTRAL, and Science Direct. The studies that met the inclusion criteria were then included in the review. The reported outcomes were pooled using the Review Manager software (RevMan 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). The literature search identified 657 articles, among which 18 were included in the review according to the inclusion criteria. Our study found that the mean postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower among individuals treated with non-opioid analgesics than with opioid analgesics SMD -1.88; 95% CI (-2.40, -1.36); p < 0.0001). Further analysis showed that the mean opioid consumption was also lower in those who received NSAIDs and other atypical analgesics (SMD -2.24; 95% CI (-2.94, -1.55); p < 0.00001) and (SMD -1.18; 95% CI (-2.18, -0.17); p = 0.02), respectively. However, in those who received paracetamol, the mean opioid consumption was comparable to that of controls (SMD -1.09; 95% CI (-2.21, 0.03); p = 0.06). Secondly, our study found that the incidence of opioid-related nausea was reduced in patients who received NOA than in controls (OR 0.38; 95% CI (0.22, 0.66); p = 0.0005). However, the incidence of vomiting was equivalent across both groups (OR 0.64; 95% CI (0.39, 1.04); p = 0.07). This study found that NOAs are good adjuvants in pain management in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. They aid in reducing the dosage of opioids required for adequate analgesia and thus also reduce the incidence of some of the related adverse events.

Keywords: (nsaid) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; analgesia; non-opioid analgesics; postoperative pain; surgery; systematic review and meta analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A PRISMA flow diagram summarizing the search strategy
Figure 2
Figure 2. A risk of bias summary showing the risk of bias of the included studies.
Oberhofer et al., 2005. [13], Rao et al., 2000. [14], Thompson et al., 2000. [15], Celik et al., 2002. [16], Kvalsvik et al., 2003. [17], Chen et al., 2004. [18], Karaman et al., 2006. [19], Bakhamees et al., 2007. [20], Lin et al., 2009. [21], Mowafi et al., 2012. [22], Silinsky et al., 2021. [23], Schmidt et al., 2021. [24], Rindos et al., 2019. [25], Nedeljkovic et al., 2021. [26], Ciftci et al., 2019. [27], Subramaniam et al., 2021. [28], Wang et al., 2020. [29], Raymond et al., 2004. [30]
Figure 3
Figure 3. A forest plot showing the mean opioid consumption in the postoperative period
Oberhofer et al., 2005 [13], Rao et al., 2000 [14], Thompson et al., 2000 [15], Celik et al., 2002 [16], Kvalsvik et al., 2003 [17], Chen et al., 2004 [18], Karaman et al., 2006 [19], Bakhamees et al., 2007 [20], Lin et al., 2009 [21], Mowafi et al., 2012 [22], Silinsky et al., 2021 [23], Schmidt et al., 2021 [24], Rindos et al., 2019 [25], Nedeljkovic et al., 2021 [26], Ciftci et al., 2019 [27], Subramaniam et al., 2021 [28], Wang et al., 2020 [29], Raymond et al., 2004 [30].
Figure 4
Figure 4. A forest plot showing the mean pain outcomes based on the various pain rating scales
Rao et al., 2000 [14], Chen et al., 2004 [18], Karaman et al., 2006 [19], Bakhamees et al., 2007 [20], Lin et al., 2009 [21], Silinsky et al., 2021 [23], Schmidt et al., 2021 [24], Rindos et al., 2019 [25], Ciftci et al., 2019 [27], Subramaniam et al., 2021 [28]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Forest plot illustrating the incidence of adverse events among patients treated with non-opioid analgesics compared to controls.
Thompson et al., 2000 [15], Celik et al., 2002 [16], Kvalsvik et al., 2003 [17], Chen et al., 2004 [18], Karaman et al., 2006 [19], Bakhamees et al., 2007 [20], Lin et al., 2009 [21], Silinsky et al., 2021 [23], Ciftci et al., 2019 [27]

Similar articles

References

    1. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Lancet. 2008;372:139–144. - PubMed
    1. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:934–944. - PubMed
    1. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, Lau J, Carr DB. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:0. - PubMed
    1. Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain. Momeni M, Crucitti M, De Kock M. Drugs. 2006;66:2321–2337. - PubMed
    1. Non-opioid analgesics in adults after major surgery: systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Martinez V, Beloeil H, Marret E, Fletcher D, Ravaud P, Trinquart L. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:22–31. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources