Exploring awareness and attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation among women of reproductive age
- PMID: 40673019
- PMCID: PMC12266863
- DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo53
Exploring awareness and attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation among women of reproductive age
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate awareness, perceptions, and attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation among a diverse group of women.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2023 using snowball sampling to distribute a structured questionnaire. The target population included women aged 18+ with childbearing potential, proficient in English. An anonymous online survey with 22 questions collected data on demographics, education, occupation, relationship status, reproductive intentions, and perceptions of oocyte cryopreservation.
Results: A total of 502 responses were analyzed. Most participants were in their thirties, had higher education, and were in committed relationships. They represented 24 countries, mainly in Europe. Over 60% planned to have children, but 85% were unfamiliar with oocyte cryopreservation. Social media (56%) was the primary information source, followed by acquaintances (33%) and healthcare professionals (25%). Only 4.6% were actively considering the procedure, while 41.3% showed potential interest. Barriers included perceived lack of necessity, age concerns, and limited information. Women considering cryopreservation were typically younger and childless. Financial constraints and information gaps significantly influenced decision-making, with about one-third suggesting better information and cost reduction could increase willingness to pursue the procedure.
Conclusion: Despite relatively high awareness of oocyte cryopreservation, actual consideration and uptake remain low. Addressing financial and informational barriers could improve acceptance, especially among younger women and those uncertain about their reproductive plans.
Keywords: Cryopreservation; Fertility; Fertility preservation; Infertility; Oocytes; Surveys and questionnaires; Women's health.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts to interest: none to declare.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of ovarian cryopreservation technology among women with ovarian diseases.Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 23;13:1612492. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612492. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40626162 Free PMC article.
-
Fertility Preservation and Infertility Treatment in Female Surgical Trainees in Alberta: A Survey of Trainee Knowledge, Attitudes, and Needs.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2025 Jan;47(1):102731. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102731. Epub 2024 Nov 28. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2025. PMID: 39615624
-
Women Electing Oocyte Cryopreservation: Characteristics, Information Sources, and Oocyte Disposition: A Systematic Review.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Mar;67(2):178-201. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13332. Epub 2022 Feb 13. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35156301
-
Counseling and cryopreservation: evaluation of patient-reported counseling and choice on method of cancer-related fertility preservation.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Oct;41(10):2807-2812. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03217-3. Epub 2024 Jul 31. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39083108
-
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28169420 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice; Committee on Genetics; U.S. Food and Drug Administration Committee Opinion No 671: perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):e61–e68. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001643. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dundar Akın O, Boza A, Yakin K, Urman B. Awareness of fertility and reproductive aging in women seeking oocyte cryopreservation, reproductive aged controls, and female health care professionals: a comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;233:146–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.009. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources