Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70367.
doi: 10.1002/alz.70367.

Structural and functional connectivity in tau mutation carriers: from presymptomatic to symptomatic frontotemporal dementia

Affiliations

Structural and functional connectivity in tau mutation carriers: from presymptomatic to symptomatic frontotemporal dementia

Arabella Bouzigues et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations cause frontotemporal dementia (FTD), characterised by behavioural, language, and motor impairments due to brain connectivity disruptions. We investigated structural and functional connectivity in 86 mutation carriers and 272 controls to map connectivity changes at different disease stages.

Methods: The CDR Dementia Staging Instrument plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Behaviour and Language domains (CDR plus NACC FTLD) stratified carriers into three groups: asymptomatic, prodromal, and symptomatic. We extracted measures of cortical thickness, white matter integrity, and functional connectivity, which were compared between each carrier group and controls using linear mixed models.

Results: Early isolated functional disruptions in salience/visual networks were present in asymptomatic carriers, along with anterior cingulate gray matter reductions. In prodromal carriers, functional changes extended to other networks, with additional structural damage in temporal poles/cingulate.

Discussion: This study shows that functional networks likely drive lifelong compensation for a genetically determined disease, manifesting clinically when structural damage reaches a critical threshold. This supports connectivity measures as potential biomarkers for MAPT-related neurodegeneration.

Highlights: Our findings reveal the progressive and staged nature of structural and functional connectivity alterations in MAPT mutation carriers, with distinct patterns at each disease stage. In asymptomatic carriers, we identified early functional connectivity alterations in salience and visual networks, despite preserved white matter and only subtle gray matter atrophy. These appear to represent both response to pathology and possible compensatory mechanisms. In prodromal carriers, functional connectivity alterations were accompanied by structural damage, including cortical atrophy and white matter tract disruptions, in regions directly connected to early-affected networks. The sequential progression, from functional connectivity changes to structural degeneration, aligns with the hypothesis that tau propagates along axonal connections, disrupting neural network integrity before measurable atrophy occurs. We propose a theoretical data-driven model of biomarker evolution in MAPT mutation carriers, highlighting functional disruptions as early indicators and structural damage as a later-stage hallmark. These connectivity biomarkers have the potential to inform therapeutic strategies and clinical trial design.

Keywords: MAPT; functional connectivity; genetic frontotemporal dementia; graph analysis; gray matter; macroscale organization; mutation; neurodegeneration; tau; tau pathology; white matter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Author disclosures are available in the Supporting Information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Tracts segmented and extracted using the automated TractSeg tool. For tracts existing in the left and right hemispheres, only the right one is shown. Adjusted from Wasserthal et al. AF, arcuate fascicle; CC, corpus callosum (rostrum [CC 1], genu [CC 2], rostral body [CC 3], anterior midbody [CC 4], posterior midbody [CC 5], isthmus [CC 6], splenium [CC 7]); CG, cingulum; ILF, inferior longitudinal fascicle; SLF, superior longitudinal fascicle (I, II, III); UF, uncinate fascicle.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cortical thickness effect sizes (Cohen's d) for each microtubule‐associated protein tau carrier group compared to controls. FTLD‐CDR score,A.  Clinical Dementia Rating plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Behavioural and Language domains global score.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
A. Summary of tracts showing significantly different diffusion metrics in each microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) carrier group compared to controls, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005. FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; AD, axial diffusivity. B. Adjusted mean fractional anisotropy and radial diffusivity values from mixed model for each group, with shaded standard deviation, along tracts showing significant early changes in MAPT prodromal carriers compared to controls.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
A. Summary of networks showing significant different graph metrics in each microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) carrier group compared to controls, with the direction of change depicted by an arrow. B. Adjusted means and standard errors from mixed model for each group and for different graph metrics within salience and visual networks which showed early changes compared to controls.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Distribution of principal and secondary gradient embedding values for each network in controls and projected on cortical surface.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Principal and secondary gradient embedding values projected on cortical surface for each microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) carrier group.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Theoretical model of gray matter, white matter, and functional connectivity neuroimaging biomarker evolution in microtubule‐associated protein tau‐mutation carriers.

References

    1. Poorkaj P, Bird TD, Wijsman E, et al. Tau is a candidate gene for chromosome 17 frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 1998;43(6):815‐825. doi: 10.1002/ana.410430617 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore KM, Nicholas J, Grossman M, et al. Age at symptom onset and death and disease duration in genetic frontotemporal dementia: an international retrospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(2):145‐156. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30394-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Swieten J, Spillantini MG. Hereditary frontotemporal dementia caused by tau gene mutations. Brain Pathol. 2007;17(1):63‐73. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00052.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woollacott IOC, Rohrer JD. The clinical spectrum of sporadic and familial forms of frontotemporal dementia. J Neurochem. 2016;138(S1):6‐31. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Staffaroni AM, Quintana M, Wendelberger B, et al. Temporal order of clinical and biomarker changes in familial frontotemporal dementia. Nat Med. 2022;28(10):2194‐2206. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01942-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding