Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 6;69(8):e0037925.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00379-25. Epub 2025 Jul 17.

Activity of ampicillin-sulbactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and comparators against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex strains isolated from respiratory and bloodstream sources: results from ACNBio study

Affiliations

Activity of ampicillin-sulbactam, sulbactam-durlobactam, and comparators against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex strains isolated from respiratory and bloodstream sources: results from ACNBio study

Ecem Buyukyanbolu et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) are associated with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. This study aims to evaluate the in vitro activity of clinically utilized antimicrobials against a contemporary collection of ABC isolates with a predominant carbapenem-resistant phenotype. Geographically dispersed US medical centers (n = 22) provided non-duplicate respiratory and bloodstream ABC isolates for surveillance testing. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by broth microdilution and interpreted according to Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoints. ABC isolates (n = 523) from respiratory tract (74.4%) and blood (25.6%) sources were recovered from patients (2023-2024). Forty percent were obtained from intensive care unit patients. Carbapenem non-susceptibility was observed in 76.9% of isolates and was more common among respiratory tract cultures. The addition of durlobactam to sulbactam decreased the MIC90 by three-doubling dilutions from 32 to 4 µg/mL, increasing the susceptibility rate to 96.9% from 33.8%. Genome sequencing of sulbactam-durlobactam non-susceptible isolates (16/523; n = 3.1%) revealed MBL and non-enzymatic resistance mechanisms. Cefiderocol inhibited 93.5% and 76.1% of isolates at CLSI and FDA susceptible breakpoints, respectively. Minocycline susceptibility was <50%, while tigecycline and eravacycline MIC50/90 were 1/2 and 0.5/1 µg/mL, respectively. Sulbactam-durlobactam displayed high activity against sulbactam (95.4%), carbapenem (96.3%), and cefiderocol (95.2%) non-susceptible isolates. Susceptibility rates of clinically utilized antimicrobials against a US collection of ABC isolates ranged from 23% to 97%, with meropenem displaying the lowest rate and sulbactam-durlobactam demonstrating the highest overall rate. Sulbactam-durlobactam activity was preserved against sulbactam, carbapenem, and cefiderocol non-susceptible isolates among respiratory tract and bloodstream isolates.

Keywords: Acinetobacter; CRAB; sulbactam; sulbactam-durlobactam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.B.M. has received research funding from Shionogi. A.T.H. has received research funding from Beckman Coulter, bioMeriuexbioMérieux, Bio-Rad, and Selux. R.L. has served as a consultant for Gradientech. W.D.K. received research grants from Merck & Co., and Melinta Therapeutics and received consultation fees from Shionogi. D.P.N. served as a consultant, speaker's bureau member, or has received research funding from Abbvie, Cepheid, Innoviva, Pfizer, Wockhardt, Shionogi, Venatorx. T.E.A. has received research funding from Venatorx, Paratek, Shionogi, Innoviva, and Spero Therapeutics. All other authors report no relevant disclosures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vázquez-López R, Solano-Gálvez SG, Juárez Vignon-Whaley JJ, Abello Vaamonde JA, Padró Alonzo LA, Rivera Reséndiz A, Muleiro Álvarez M, Vega López EN, Franyuti-Kelly G, Álvarez-Hernández DA, Moncaleano Guzmán V, Juárez Bañuelos JE, Marcos Felix J, González Barrios JA, Barrientos Fortes T. 2020. Acinetobacter baumannii resistance: a real challenge for clinicians. Antibiotics (Basel) 9:205. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9040205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castanheira M, Mendes RE, Gales AC. 2023. Global epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex. Clin Infect Dis 76:S166–S178. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lemos EV, de la Hoz FP, Einarson TR, McGhan WF, Quevedo E, Castañeda C, Kawai K. 2014. Carbapenem resistance and mortality in patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:416–423. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12363 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appaneal HJ, Lopes VV, LaPlante KL, Caffrey AR. 2022. Treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of mortality among a national cohort of admitted patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e0197521. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01975-21 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Isler B, Doi Y, Bonomo RA, Paterson DL. 2019. New treatment options against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01110-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01110-18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources