Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2025 Sep 1;11(9):999-1010.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2020.

COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Uptake and Effectiveness Among US Adults With Cancer

Affiliations
Comment

COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Uptake and Effectiveness Among US Adults With Cancer

Jacek Skarbinski et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Persons with cancer are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection, but the additional benefit of COVID-19 boosters is unclear.

Objective: To assess COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and number needed to vaccinate (NNV) among persons with cancer of an additional dose of the monovalent COVID-19 vaccine.

Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective cohort study conducted in 4 health care systems in the US among persons with cancer receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Statistical analysis was conducted between March 2023 and August 2024.

Exposures: Receipt of an additional dose of the monovalent COVID-19 vaccine before January 1, 2022, with follow-up until August 31, 2022, and the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine from September 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023.

Main outcomes and measures: COVID-19 hospitalization, diagnosed COVID-19, and COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Results: Among 72 831 persons with cancer (17 922 female individuals [24.6%]), 69% received a monovalent booster by January 1, 2022. During 34 006 person-years of follow-up, the COVID-19 hospitalization rate was 30.5 per 1000 person-years among patients who received a monovalent booster vs 41.9 per 1000 person-years among patients who received the primary series alone, with an adjusted VE of 29.2% (95% CI, 19.9%-37.3%) and NNV to prevent 1 COVID-19 hospitalization of 166 (95% CI, 130-244). There was also significant VE to prevent diagnosed COVID-19 (8.5% [95% CI, 3.7%-13.0%]) and COVID-19-related ICU admission (35.6% [95% CI, 20.0%-48.3%]). Among 88 417 persons with cancer (24 589 female individuals [27.8%]) with 81 027 person-years of follow-up during the bivalent period, patients who received this booster (38%) had a COVID-19 hospitalization rate of 13.4 per 1000 person-years vs 21.7 per 1000 person-years among persons who did not receive a bivalent vaccine, with an adjusted VE of 29.9% (95% CI, 19.4%-39.1%) and NNV to prevent 1 COVID-19 hospitalization of 451 (95% CI, 345-697); the adjusted VE was 30.1% (95% CI, 7.7%-47.0%) to prevent COVID-19-related ICU admission.

Conclusions and relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, COVID-19 booster vaccinations were associated with significant protection against severe COVID-19, with a favorable NNV among persons with cancer. However, uptake of COVID-19 vaccine boosters was low, and interventions are therefore justified to increase COVID-19 uptake in this high-risk population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Elkin reported receiving grants from National Cancer Institute (NCI) during the conduct of the study. Dr Reckamp reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merus, Novartis, Novocure, and Pfizer; and funding to her institution from Genentech, Blueprint, Daiichi Sankyo, Elevation Oncology, and Janssen outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Pooled Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) and Number Needed to Vaccinate to Prevent COVID-19 Hospitalization in Persons With Cancer and Nonimmunocompromised Persons Who Received 1 Additional Dose of Monovalent and/or Bivalent COVID-19 Vaccine
VE = (1 – pooled HR); HRs calculated from inverse variance–weighted fixed effects of multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (controlled for age, sex, race and ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index score) from each site. For bivalent analysis, patients' vaccination status included as of index date. Patients may have had ≥1 diagnosis and/or received ≥1 treatment in past year and included in analysis of each qualifying stratum. HR indicates hazard ratio; and NB, no benefit. aEsophageal, pancreatic, gall bladder, anus, anal canal, and anorectum.

Comment on

References

    1. Dai M, Liu D, Liu M, et al. Patients with cancer appear more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: a multicenter study during the COVID-19 outbreak. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(6):783-791. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0422 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Interim clinical considerations for use of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States. May 12, 2025. Accessed June 4, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-co...
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. ; C4591001 Clinical Trial Group . Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603-2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, et al. ; COVE Study Group . Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403-416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hua T, Fan R, Fan Y, Chen F. Immune response of COVID-19 vaccines in solid cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2357424. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2357424 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances