The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization
- PMID: 4067497
- PMCID: PMC1348181
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-245
The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization
Abstract
This paper is a selective review of research that addresses the validity of two interpretations of stimulus generalization. One interpretation, referred to as the descriptive stimulus-control interpretation, proposes that during stimulus generalization a continuous relation exists between stimulus and response dimensions. The other interpretation, referred to as the quantal interpretation, proposes that a stimulus-response relation functions as a unit that may or may not occur. From the latter viewpoint, the continuity typically obtained during generalization tests is deemed to be artifactual and to result from averaging across multiple controlling stimulus-response relations. Studies examining the contribution of these multiple relations to generalization gradients are reviewed. With few exceptions, the quantal interpretation appears to better characterize the results of these studies. Implications for peak shift, selection of analytical level, and identification of the behavioral unit are discussed, as well as factors that may determine the acceptability of the quantal interpretation.
Similar articles
-
STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7(5):369-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-369. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964. PMID: 14218295 Free PMC article.
-
On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity.J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):177-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-177. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971. PMID: 5121854 Free PMC article.
-
Some effects of discriminative training with equated frequency of reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):415-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-415. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968. PMID: 5672250 Free PMC article.
-
Quantal vs. graded generalization in drug discrimination: measuring a graded response.J Neurosci Methods. 1990 Jan;31(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90005-z. J Neurosci Methods. 1990. PMID: 2407907 Review.
-
[Drug discrimination: methodology and current problems].Yakubutsu Seishin Kodo. 1985 Dec;5(4):289-302. Yakubutsu Seishin Kodo. 1985. PMID: 3914149 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Joint control and the selection of stimuli from their description.Anal Verbal Behav. 2006;22(1):129-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03393035. Anal Verbal Behav. 2006. PMID: 22477352 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus control topography coherence theory: foundations and extensions.Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):195-213. doi: 10.1007/BF03392076. Behav Anal. 2003. PMID: 22478402 Free PMC article.
-
Discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and diazepam in humans.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;103(4):436-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02244241. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991. PMID: 2062984 Clinical Trial.
-
Context specificity of operant discrimination performance in pigeons.J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 May;55(3):267-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-267. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991. PMID: 16812636 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus control shaping and stimulus control topographies.Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;15(1):89-94. doi: 10.1007/BF03392591. Behav Anal. 1992. PMID: 22478119 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources